Re: Realism in Middle-earth
Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2018 3:51 pm
Realism, I suppose.
Realism, I suppose.
I will have to track that down, but based on your summary I think I agree.Stormcrow wrote: ↑Sat Jan 06, 2018 1:08 pmWhat you're describing, Glorelendil, is addressed by Tolkien in his essay "On Fairy Stories." If one is suspending one's disbelief, then the artist has already failed. The author's job is to subcreate (because only God can "create") a secondary world in which the reader can invest his secondary belief. You know it's not the primary world, but you willingly enter the secondary world, and if the author has done a good job, you believe in it while you're there--you are in an enchanted state. When the author has NOT done a good job, you cannot invest secondary belief in the secondary world, and while you're there you must consciously suspend your disbelief.
I also don't like the term immersion applied to RPGs. They work exactly as Tolkien described for stories: if the game master has successfully subcreated a secondary world, the players can invest their secondary belief in it. Exactly how immersive that experience has to be will vary from game to game and person to person, but I think people don't need as much as some think. A master storyteller or a good game master can enchant his or her audience or players regardless of distractions from outside. If immersion is not being used to mean paying attention to the story/game, then it's being used as an excuse for a failure of the author/game master to enchant.
Sure it is. As long as you are not claiming that some detail (including someone else’s use of information their character wouldn’t have) is so unrealistic that it ruined your immersion.
I'm not claiming anything, except that there is a whole lot of drivel in this thread that is borderline narcissism.Glorelendil wrote: ↑Sat Jan 06, 2018 6:09 pmSure it is. As long as you are not claiming that some detail (including someone else’s use of information their character wouldn’t have) is so unrealistic that it ruined your immersion.
You'll find "On Fairy Stories" in Tales from the Perilous Realm, The Tolkien Reader, The Monsters and Critics, and Other Essays, and Tree and Leaf. A stand-alone version was published in 2008 called Tolkien On Fairy-Stories.Glorelendil wrote: ↑Sat Jan 06, 2018 5:45 pmI will have to track that down, but based on your summary I think I agree.
Um...because he's not necessarily the final arbiter of the answer? But I'm willing to bet he has some great insight.Stormcrow wrote: ↑Sun Jan 07, 2018 12:45 amYou'll find "On Fairy Stories" in Tales from the Perilous Realm, The Tolkien Reader, The Monsters and Critics, and Other Essays, and Tree and Leaf. A stand-alone version was published in 2008 called Tolkien On Fairy-Stories.Glorelendil wrote: ↑Sat Jan 06, 2018 5:45 pmI will have to track that down, but based on your summary I think I agree.
Do read it. It's a brilliant explanation of why anyone would bother with fairy stories in the first place, and really is all about the topic of this thread. How better to answer your questions than by hearing Tolkien's own answer?
Really? I thought what I typed was quite honest, simple to understand and to the point. We Aussies are know for calling a spade a spade you know. I did consider writing it in a more diplomatic tone but that would have required some prose, a dash of sarcasm and use of the word, dare I say it, immersion in an unsanctioned manner. So in the end I thought brevity was the best option.