Shadow Bane clarification

Adventure in the world of J.R.R. Tolkien’s The Lord of the Rings. Learn more at our website: http://www.cubicle7.co.uk/our-games/the-one-ring/
artaxerxes
Posts: 17
Joined: Thu Jun 27, 2013 9:27 am

Re: Shadow Bane clarification

Post by artaxerxes » Tue Mar 11, 2014 3:45 pm

It seems woefully under powered to begin with, I can easily see an argument for it just applying in all situations where the attacking PC is a *not* a servant of Shadow.

Evening
Posts: 119
Joined: Sun Jun 02, 2013 7:22 am

Re: Shadow Bane clarification

Post by Evening » Tue Mar 11, 2014 4:27 pm

Probably best to wait for Gareth and Francesco to comment as to what the designer's intentions were. It may be as simple as goblins and orcs, and possibly trolls.
Don't start arguments over who has a better grasp of hiking and boating or someone might just bring down the banhammer.

Beran
Posts: 1059
Joined: Wed May 08, 2013 5:03 pm

Re: Shadow Bane clarification

Post by Beran » Tue Mar 11, 2014 4:46 pm

I would say it covers Orc, Uruks, Goblins, (for the most part) Olug hai (possibly other trolls).

User avatar
Mim
Posts: 648
Joined: Thu May 09, 2013 4:44 pm

Re: Shadow Bane clarification

Post by Mim » Tue Mar 11, 2014 4:46 pm

Otaku-sempai wrote:
Yusei wrote:I agree with Beran, spiders are not servants of the Shadow, nor are other animals or creatures who are not actively plotting against the Free People.
The giant spiders are not natural creatures, though, are they? They are demon-spiders descended from Ungoliant and Shelob. I would definitely count them as servants of Shadow.
Agreed. These are generally considered to be spirits that take spider form. Ditto for some of the other servants of the Enemy, such as Werewolves.

User avatar
doctheweasel
Posts: 257
Joined: Thu May 09, 2013 10:14 pm
Location: Sacramento, CA
Contact:

Re: Shadow Bane clarification

Post by doctheweasel » Tue Mar 11, 2014 5:55 pm

I'm liking where this is going.

Wargs? Yea or nea? I'm not sure we have enough history to ensure they were created by Morgoth.

Angelalex242
Posts: 1116
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2013 7:52 pm
Location: Valinor

Re: Shadow Bane clarification

Post by Angelalex242 » Tue Mar 11, 2014 6:23 pm

Wargs are corrupted wolves, like Orcs are corrupted elves.

So they qualify. Particularly under my 'anything with a hate score' definition.

Beran
Posts: 1059
Joined: Wed May 08, 2013 5:03 pm

Re: Shadow Bane clarification

Post by Beran » Tue Mar 11, 2014 6:26 pm

Mim wrote:
Otaku-sempai wrote:
Yusei wrote:I agree with Beran, spiders are not servants of the Shadow, nor are other animals or creatures who are not actively plotting against the Free People.
The giant spiders are not natural creatures, though, are they? They are demon-spiders descended from Ungoliant and Shelob. I would definitely count them as servants of Shadow.
Agreed. These are generally considered to be spirits that take spider form. Ditto for some of the other servants of the Enemy, such as Werewolves.
Going on that logic path orcs, goblins, trolls, wolves and wargs aren't servants of the shadow then. Ungoliqnt started out as a follower of Melkor, but struck out on her own at which point she ceased being a sevant of the shadow. In the books shelob is basically doing her own thing as well , she wasn't an active agent of the enemy. All agents of the shadow are evil, but not all evil are agents of the shadow.

Glorelendil
Posts: 5162
Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 5:20 pm

Re: Shadow Bane clarification

Post by Glorelendil » Tue Mar 11, 2014 6:44 pm

Otaku-sempai wrote:
Yusei wrote:I agree with Beran, spiders are not servants of the Shadow, nor are other animals or creatures who are not actively plotting against the Free People.
The giant spiders are not natural creatures, though, are they? They are demon-spiders descended from Ungoliant and Shelob. I would definitely count them as servants of Shadow.
So both terms are up for interpretation. Both "Servant" and "the Shadow" could be literal or figurative.
The Munchkin Formerly Known as Elfcrusher
Journey Computer | Combat Simulator | Bestiary | Weapon Calculator

Angelalex242
Posts: 1116
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2013 7:52 pm
Location: Valinor

Re: Shadow Bane clarification

Post by Angelalex242 » Tue Mar 11, 2014 6:44 pm

That's why I call it 'anything with a hate score.'

Shadow Bane is a ridiculously weak virtue as it is. Weakening it further is worse then pointless.

(and if you think it isn't weak, do the math! Just by what percentage does it really help you? It MIGHT be worth it if you've got a 2d weapon skill, but 3d+? You're going to hit anyway.)

Yusei
Posts: 319
Joined: Thu May 09, 2013 2:35 pm
Location: Paris, France

Re: Shadow Bane clarification

Post by Yusei » Tue Mar 11, 2014 6:52 pm

I agree, it's a very weak virtue, since it gives you a bonus when you don't need one. It needs a lot more fixing than just giving the bonus against all creatures.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests