Hi all,
Is the despair hazard description missing in the pdf? I cannot find it anywhere...
clarification and amendments pdf - despair?
clarification and amendments pdf - despair?
Baruk-Khazad! Khazad-ai-Menu!
Re: clarification and amendments pdf - despair?
Well, there are sample hazard episodes but neither the full rule nor the clarification document has an example of despair. In any case, they are just examples... not rules.
Jacob Rodgers, occasional nitwit.
This space intentionally blank.
This space intentionally blank.
Re: clarification and amendments pdf - despair?
Thanks for the answer. I am afraid I don't quite understand new Hazard rules. Now when you get a Sauron's eye on a Fatigue test, a Hazard is triggered. You roll on the table and get a Hazard but, how do you know what Hazard is tied to a specific fellowship role? Rolling in the table in page 35 of the non-updated manual? Or you just select one companion randomly?
That's why the omision of a despair example bothers me - I don't know to what role is linked.
That's why the omision of a despair example bothers me - I don't know to what role is linked.
Baruk-Khazad! Khazad-ai-Menu!
Re: clarification and amendments pdf - despair?
Yeah, I don't know why the Hazards Target table wasn't included:
Basically, its:
G - Players' choice
1-3 Guide
4-5 Scout
6-7 Huntsman
8-9 Look-out Man
10 All companions
S - Role not covered/LM Choice
Which means that being the Guide is more dangerous than the other roles.
Basically, its:
G - Players' choice
1-3 Guide
4-5 Scout
6-7 Huntsman
8-9 Look-out Man
10 All companions
S - Role not covered/LM Choice
Which means that being the Guide is more dangerous than the other roles.
Jacob Rodgers, occasional nitwit.
This space intentionally blank.
This space intentionally blank.
Re: clarification and amendments pdf - despair?
It's because it's already in the Loremaster's Guide, p35.zedturtle wrote:Yeah, I don't know why the Hazards Target table wasn't included
Re: clarification and amendments pdf - despair?
I suspected that might be the case but missed it on a quick skim through.Andrew wrote:It's because it's already in the Loremaster's Guide, p35.zedturtle wrote:Yeah, I don't know why the Hazards Target table wasn't included
Jacob Rodgers, occasional nitwit.
This space intentionally blank.
This space intentionally blank.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Wbweather and 5 guests