Some questions
Re: Some questions
Great sword could simply mean big sword or even magnificent sword. I don't think we can read much into it.
-
- Posts: 5160
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 5:20 pm
Re: Some questions
Yeah, this.Stormcrow wrote:Great sword could simply mean big sword or even magnificent sword. I don't think we can read much into it.
Also remember that it's from a Hobbit's point of view, scale-wise.
The Munchkin Formerly Known as Elfcrusher
Journey Computer | Combat Simulator | Bestiary | Weapon Calculator
Journey Computer | Combat Simulator | Bestiary | Weapon Calculator
-
- Posts: 5160
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 5:20 pm
Re: Some questions
Oh, as to the part about picking up the weapon of a fallen foe (or ally, for that matter) to save time when you've lost your own weapon, I'd maybe allow an Athletics roll, but with the caveat that if you fail the roll something even worse happens. Great place to use Battle dice.
The Munchkin Formerly Known as Elfcrusher
Journey Computer | Combat Simulator | Bestiary | Weapon Calculator
Journey Computer | Combat Simulator | Bestiary | Weapon Calculator
Re: Some questions
Good questions, Azrael. It sounds like you're sensitive to the "D&D mentality" that some have (no offense intended), and it might be wise to encourage your player to be careful with stuff like this. Remind him that simply looting every enemy (especially if his intent is to get the baddest, most powerful weapon, consequences be damned) could lead to some negative consequences, as his character struggles with the corrupting influence of the Shadow.
Tale of Years for a second, lower-level group (in the same campaign).
-
- Posts: 39
- Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2014 8:45 pm
Re: Some questions
RIght. Like... don't get me wrong, I love D&D, and we've played that for years. But I've loved Middle Earth since the seventh grade, and I would like to chance to play in that world, by its own rules, as well.
Re: Some questions
Absolutely. And I would include a healthy dose of Shadow... orcs fit my definition of corrupt.Rue wrote:2) If I ran into a PC toting an Orc blade I'd be much less likely to trust them/help them, etc, unless they could convince me why the foul thing was necessary.
- Robin Smallburrow
- Posts: 564
- Joined: Mon May 13, 2013 10:35 am
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
Re: Some questions
Azrael
Your player sounds disturbingly Munchin-like to me. My advice on dealing with such players:
1. Players must understand the consequences of their actions in a setting like Middle-earth, a much more moral place than is D&D. I created a document for exactly such players to understand that what they can get away with in D&D they cannot in Middle-Earth:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/656 ... 20know.xls
2. The RAW state clearly that other actions other than an attack are not usually possible. However, I don't mind players trying to do extra in a combat round IF they have a relevant trait such as 'Swift' or 'Nimble' as I can see an argument for a Swift character being able to do this. Normal characters who try should be severely penalised (at least -4 penalty to their attack IMHO).
3. Looting is regarded as 'unheroic' and such characters will be 'looked down upon' in MIddle-earth (as per my document above). Depending on the circumstances (who, what, where etc.) worth a few Shadow Points at least.
4. In regards to your second post the new Rivendell supplement has a lot on your players' question re Magical Treasure, specifically the new Fellowship Phase Undertaking 'Go See A Loremaster' is I think what your player is after (the PC themselves certainly wouldn't be able to until they had at least a Lore Skill Rank of 4).
Hope this helps!
Robin S.
Your player sounds disturbingly Munchin-like to me. My advice on dealing with such players:
1. Players must understand the consequences of their actions in a setting like Middle-earth, a much more moral place than is D&D. I created a document for exactly such players to understand that what they can get away with in D&D they cannot in Middle-Earth:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/656 ... 20know.xls
2. The RAW state clearly that other actions other than an attack are not usually possible. However, I don't mind players trying to do extra in a combat round IF they have a relevant trait such as 'Swift' or 'Nimble' as I can see an argument for a Swift character being able to do this. Normal characters who try should be severely penalised (at least -4 penalty to their attack IMHO).
3. Looting is regarded as 'unheroic' and such characters will be 'looked down upon' in MIddle-earth (as per my document above). Depending on the circumstances (who, what, where etc.) worth a few Shadow Points at least.
4. In regards to your second post the new Rivendell supplement has a lot on your players' question re Magical Treasure, specifically the new Fellowship Phase Undertaking 'Go See A Loremaster' is I think what your player is after (the PC themselves certainly wouldn't be able to until they had at least a Lore Skill Rank of 4).
Hope this helps!
Robin S.
To access all my links for my TOR Resources - please click on this link >> http://bit.ly/1gjXkCo
Re: Some questions
However, keep in mind that there is precedence for 'looting' of a sort in Middle Earth. After the battle of Amon Hen, Legolas replenishes his arrows from the Uruk Hai. Aragorn, Legolas, and Gimli also take some of the weapons and shields of the Uruks to place at Boromir's feet in his funeral boat.
“War must be, while we defend our lives against a destroyer who would devour all; but I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend.” ~ Faramir
-
- Posts: 1650
- Joined: Wed May 08, 2013 9:28 pm
- Location: Sunny South Coast of Britain
Re: Some questions
The latter is honouring the dead with a selection of the enemies weapons taken from those he slew. A sort of honour guard for his journey. It cannot be described as looting and, based on the finds in graves from the period used by JRRT as inspiration, the addition of weapons either those of the warrior or possibly of his defeated enemies was a common occurrence. We are also now finding that the commonly held belief that only men were buried with weapons was incorrect and it may be a status thing instead.Seosaidh wrote:However, keep in mind that there is precedence for 'looting' of a sort in Middle Earth. After the battle of Amon Hen, Legolas replenishes his arrows from the Uruk Hai. Aragorn, Legolas, and Gimli also take some of the weapons and shields of the Uruks to place at Boromir's feet in his funeral boat.
Some TOR Information on my G+ Drive.
https://drive.google.com/folderview?id= ... sp=sharing
"The One Ring's not a computer game, dictated by stats and inflexible rules, it's a story telling game." - Clawless Dragon
https://drive.google.com/folderview?id= ... sp=sharing
"The One Ring's not a computer game, dictated by stats and inflexible rules, it's a story telling game." - Clawless Dragon
Re: Some questions
Fair point.The latter is honouring the dead with a selection of the enemies weapons taken from those he slew. A sort of honour guard for his journey. It cannot be described as looting and, based on the finds in graves from the period used by JRRT as inspiration, the addition of weapons either those of the warrior or possibly of his defeated enemies was a common occurrence.

“War must be, while we defend our lives against a destroyer who would devour all; but I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend.” ~ Faramir
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: hlibnpr and 2 guests