I fail to understand how this adds anything to the conversation.Stormcrow wrote:This video is the equivalent of a six year old filming himself pointing his finger and shouting, "Pew! Pew! Pew!"
Combat Archery
Re: Combat Archery
Jacob Rodgers, occasional nitwit.
This space intentionally blank.
This space intentionally blank.
Re: Combat Archery
That's kind of my point. I'm not saying that his technique is wrong. Actually I'm pretty positive that it should really work, but I think that the combination of lack of data (they didn't show the specifications of the bows he uses) and low quality photage might led people to discount the results or to overhype them.zedturtle wrote:Part of his point in making the video is that bows can be effective weapons at what we'd consider close range. None of his techniques are designed to be effective at 100 yards or whatever.Balou1917 wrote:Then you have to wonder how much draw was used to penetrate the chain mail. That would still be a nasty wound.Woodclaw wrote:That was something I noticed too, I don't know if it's a consequence of the extremely high rate of fire combined with the low quality of the video, but I got the distinct impression that he does half-draws most of the time. In terms of speed at short range that makes a lot of sense, but I think it wouldn't be that efficient at longer ranges.
People have pointed out that he's using a more powerful bow during the chainmail penetration segment. But I wonder if his technique would work with a traditional bow at full draw. That's really what he needs to do to silence his critics... a good high-speed camera and a traditional bow. I doubt he's 100% right about historical techniques but I doubt he's 100% wrong either.
Last edited by Woodclaw on Mon Jan 26, 2015 9:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"What is the point of having free will if one cannot occasionally spit in the eye of destiny?" ("Gentleman" John Marcone)
-
- Posts: 5160
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 5:20 pm
Re: Combat Archery
I also wonder how many takes each stunt required.
The Munchkin Formerly Known as Elfcrusher
Journey Computer | Combat Simulator | Bestiary | Weapon Calculator
Journey Computer | Combat Simulator | Bestiary | Weapon Calculator
-
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Thu May 09, 2013 9:23 pm
Re: Combat Archery
Some informed critique of the video
http://geekdad.com/2015/01/danish-archer
http://geekdad.com/2015/01/danish-archer
-
- Posts: 69
- Joined: Sat Sep 13, 2014 10:37 pm
Re: Combat Archery
Ok, so for actual game play we know following:
It is possible to fight in forward stance with a bow, but you need a lot of skill (TN +6 e.g.). However, if you only wear leather armour and you do the stupid dancing, it gets harder to hit you, let's say TN +6. Ergo, you can fight in forward stance, but from a game point perspective, it's stupid...
It is possible to fight in forward stance with a bow, but you need a lot of skill (TN +6 e.g.). However, if you only wear leather armour and you do the stupid dancing, it gets harder to hit you, let's say TN +6. Ergo, you can fight in forward stance, but from a game point perspective, it's stupid...

Re: Combat Archery
Fridokind Wargaug wrote:Ok, so for actual game play we know following:
It is possible to fight in forward stance with a bow, but you need a lot of skill (TN +6 e.g.). However, if you only wear leather armour and you do the stupid dancing, it gets harder to hit you, let's say TN +6. Ergo, you can fight in forward stance, but from a game point perspective, it's stupid...

- - - - -
Thanks for the very informative link above, as well.
I'd like to think that he's got to have considered some of this stuff... After all, what's the next step? If he's looking for legitimacy, Mythbusters/Legit news/information show seems to be the way to go. That, or showing off in front of experts, where the editing angle can't be done at all.
As I said before, I don't think that this is 100% real... but it's a fun way of thinking about archers as a more dynamic sort of person.
Jacob Rodgers, occasional nitwit.
This space intentionally blank.
This space intentionally blank.
- Yepesnopes
- Posts: 271
- Joined: Wed May 08, 2013 4:55 pm
Re: Combat Archery
Now I see where the designers of D&D get their ideas from!
Impressive skills nonetheless!
Impressive skills nonetheless!
Re: Combat Archery
I would like to see Mike Loades taking a look at this.zedturtle wrote:Fridokind Wargaug wrote:Ok, so for actual game play we know following:
It is possible to fight in forward stance with a bow, but you need a lot of skill (TN +6 e.g.). However, if you only wear leather armour and you do the stupid dancing, it gets harder to hit you, let's say TN +6. Ergo, you can fight in forward stance, but from a game point perspective, it's stupid...
- - - - -
Thanks for the very informative link above, as well.
I'd like to think that he's got to have considered some of this stuff... After all, what's the next step? If he's looking for legitimacy, Mythbusters/Legit news/information show seems to be the way to go. That, or showing off in front of experts, where the editing angle can't be done at all.
"What is the point of having free will if one cannot occasionally spit in the eye of destiny?" ("Gentleman" John Marcone)
-
- Posts: 5160
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 5:20 pm
Re: Combat Archery
I have to admit, one of my favourite parts to this video is how the guy moves/runs/jumps. As that critique says, it's evocative of Star Wars Kid.
The Munchkin Formerly Known as Elfcrusher
Journey Computer | Combat Simulator | Bestiary | Weapon Calculator
Journey Computer | Combat Simulator | Bestiary | Weapon Calculator
- Jon Hodgson
- Posts: 1375
- Joined: Wed Apr 24, 2013 11:53 am
- Location: Scotland
Re: Combat Archery
Some commentary from Mr Loades, in his usual incisive and insightful style: https://www.facebook.com/mikeloades/pos ... 1860592099Woodclaw wrote: I would like to see Mike Loades taking a look at this.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests