Combat Archery

Adventure in the world of J.R.R. Tolkien’s The Lord of the Rings. Learn more at our website: http://www.cubicle7.co.uk/our-games/the-one-ring/
zedturtle
Posts: 3289
Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2014 12:03 am

Re: Combat Archery

Post by zedturtle » Mon Jan 26, 2015 8:24 am

Stormcrow wrote:This video is the equivalent of a six year old filming himself pointing his finger and shouting, "Pew! Pew! Pew!"
I fail to understand how this adds anything to the conversation.
Jacob Rodgers, occasional nitwit.

This space intentionally blank.

Woodclaw
Posts: 408
Joined: Fri Dec 27, 2013 1:48 pm
Location: Como, Italia

Re: Combat Archery

Post by Woodclaw » Mon Jan 26, 2015 8:56 am

zedturtle wrote:
Balou1917 wrote:
Woodclaw wrote:That was something I noticed too, I don't know if it's a consequence of the extremely high rate of fire combined with the low quality of the video, but I got the distinct impression that he does half-draws most of the time. In terms of speed at short range that makes a lot of sense, but I think it wouldn't be that efficient at longer ranges.
Then you have to wonder how much draw was used to penetrate the chain mail. That would still be a nasty wound.
Part of his point in making the video is that bows can be effective weapons at what we'd consider close range. None of his techniques are designed to be effective at 100 yards or whatever.

People have pointed out that he's using a more powerful bow during the chainmail penetration segment. But I wonder if his technique would work with a traditional bow at full draw. That's really what he needs to do to silence his critics... a good high-speed camera and a traditional bow. I doubt he's 100% right about historical techniques but I doubt he's 100% wrong either.
That's kind of my point. I'm not saying that his technique is wrong. Actually I'm pretty positive that it should really work, but I think that the combination of lack of data (they didn't show the specifications of the bows he uses) and low quality photage might led people to discount the results or to overhype them.
Last edited by Woodclaw on Mon Jan 26, 2015 9:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"What is the point of having free will if one cannot occasionally spit in the eye of destiny?" ("Gentleman" John Marcone)

Glorelendil
Posts: 5160
Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 5:20 pm

Re: Combat Archery

Post by Glorelendil » Mon Jan 26, 2015 8:09 pm

I also wonder how many takes each stunt required.
The Munchkin Formerly Known as Elfcrusher
Journey Computer | Combat Simulator | Bestiary | Weapon Calculator

codesmithKarl
Posts: 1
Joined: Thu May 09, 2013 9:23 pm

Re: Combat Archery

Post by codesmithKarl » Mon Jan 26, 2015 8:37 pm

Some informed critique of the video
http://geekdad.com/2015/01/danish-archer

Fridokind Wargaug
Posts: 69
Joined: Sat Sep 13, 2014 10:37 pm

Re: Combat Archery

Post by Fridokind Wargaug » Tue Jan 27, 2015 12:13 am

Ok, so for actual game play we know following:
It is possible to fight in forward stance with a bow, but you need a lot of skill (TN +6 e.g.). However, if you only wear leather armour and you do the stupid dancing, it gets harder to hit you, let's say TN +6. Ergo, you can fight in forward stance, but from a game point perspective, it's stupid... :D

zedturtle
Posts: 3289
Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2014 12:03 am

Re: Combat Archery

Post by zedturtle » Tue Jan 27, 2015 1:01 am

Fridokind Wargaug wrote:Ok, so for actual game play we know following:
It is possible to fight in forward stance with a bow, but you need a lot of skill (TN +6 e.g.). However, if you only wear leather armour and you do the stupid dancing, it gets harder to hit you, let's say TN +6. Ergo, you can fight in forward stance, but from a game point perspective, it's stupid... :D
:D

- - - - -

Thanks for the very informative link above, as well.

I'd like to think that he's got to have considered some of this stuff... After all, what's the next step? If he's looking for legitimacy, Mythbusters/Legit news/information show seems to be the way to go. That, or showing off in front of experts, where the editing angle can't be done at all.

As I said before, I don't think that this is 100% real... but it's a fun way of thinking about archers as a more dynamic sort of person.
Jacob Rodgers, occasional nitwit.

This space intentionally blank.

Yepesnopes
Posts: 271
Joined: Wed May 08, 2013 4:55 pm

Re: Combat Archery

Post by Yepesnopes » Tue Jan 27, 2015 7:32 am

Now I see where the designers of D&D get their ideas from!
Impressive skills nonetheless!

Woodclaw
Posts: 408
Joined: Fri Dec 27, 2013 1:48 pm
Location: Como, Italia

Re: Combat Archery

Post by Woodclaw » Tue Jan 27, 2015 9:07 am

zedturtle wrote:
Fridokind Wargaug wrote:Ok, so for actual game play we know following:
It is possible to fight in forward stance with a bow, but you need a lot of skill (TN +6 e.g.). However, if you only wear leather armour and you do the stupid dancing, it gets harder to hit you, let's say TN +6. Ergo, you can fight in forward stance, but from a game point perspective, it's stupid... :D
:D

- - - - -

Thanks for the very informative link above, as well.

I'd like to think that he's got to have considered some of this stuff... After all, what's the next step? If he's looking for legitimacy, Mythbusters/Legit news/information show seems to be the way to go. That, or showing off in front of experts, where the editing angle can't be done at all.
I would like to see Mike Loades taking a look at this.
"What is the point of having free will if one cannot occasionally spit in the eye of destiny?" ("Gentleman" John Marcone)

Glorelendil
Posts: 5160
Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 5:20 pm

Re: Combat Archery

Post by Glorelendil » Tue Jan 27, 2015 3:45 pm

I have to admit, one of my favourite parts to this video is how the guy moves/runs/jumps. As that critique says, it's evocative of Star Wars Kid.
The Munchkin Formerly Known as Elfcrusher
Journey Computer | Combat Simulator | Bestiary | Weapon Calculator

Jon Hodgson
Posts: 1375
Joined: Wed Apr 24, 2013 11:53 am
Location: Scotland

Re: Combat Archery

Post by Jon Hodgson » Tue Jan 27, 2015 3:52 pm

Woodclaw wrote: I would like to see Mike Loades taking a look at this.
Some commentary from Mr Loades, in his usual incisive and insightful style: https://www.facebook.com/mikeloades/pos ... 1860592099
Jon Hodgson
Creative Director, Cubicle 7
Like us on Facebook!

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests