The First Age

Adventure in the world of J.R.R. Tolkien’s The Lord of the Rings. Learn more at our website: http://www.cubicle7.co.uk/our-games/the-one-ring/
Post Reply
Blubbo Baggins
Posts: 279
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2014 4:34 pm

The First Age

Post by Blubbo Baggins » Thu Jul 16, 2015 10:19 pm

Has anyone tried doing a theme conversion (using the same rules just re-skinning) of the locations and cultures for a campaign set in the First Age?

zedturtle
Posts: 3289
Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2014 12:03 am

Re: The First Age

Post by zedturtle » Thu Jul 16, 2015 11:46 pm

Blubbo Baggins wrote:Has anyone tried doing a theme conversion (using the same rules just re-skinning) of the locations and cultures for a campaign set in the First Age?
Ever since Wyz asked the question in the thread at rpg.net, I've been thinking of mechanical ways to allow the most powerful of the Calaquendi to do what we see them do in the First Age. But that's a project that squarely belongs in the House Rules thread.

I've not seen anything particular, other than some musings and expressions of interest.
Jacob Rodgers, occasional nitwit.

This space intentionally blank.

Blubbo Baggins
Posts: 279
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2014 4:34 pm

Re: The First Age

Post by Blubbo Baggins » Fri Jul 17, 2015 1:34 am

Yeah, and I'm not imagining changing anything about the cultures, merely just renaming everything to fit the themes. The cultures of men would become the Houses of Men (Hador, Beor, Haleth), Mirkwood Elves the Sindar/Elves of Doriath, and High Elves would be from any of the Noldor.

I wouldn't want to re-skin anything until the Adventurer's Companion was out, giving more options. I'd be interested in a project like this though.

Angelalex242
Posts: 1116
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2013 7:52 pm
Location: Valinor

Re: The First Age

Post by Angelalex242 » Fri Jul 17, 2015 5:21 am

Actually...you're right, you don't need to change anything.

It's true people were more badass in the First Age then they are now...

But so were the badguys. In the third age, there's one Balrog and one Dragon.

In the 1st age, Durin's Bane and Smaug would've been average joes.

And even Sauron himself was just somebody's #2.

Glorelendil
Posts: 5160
Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 5:20 pm

Re: The First Age

Post by Glorelendil » Fri Jul 17, 2015 12:41 pm

Angelalex242 wrote: It's true people were more badass in the First Age then they are now...
Not necessarily. "The story grows with its telling" is a perfectly valid interpretation.

Do you believe, for instance, that Methuselah actually lived to 800?
The Munchkin Formerly Known as Elfcrusher
Journey Computer | Combat Simulator | Bestiary | Weapon Calculator

Angelalex242
Posts: 1116
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2013 7:52 pm
Location: Valinor

Re: The First Age

Post by Angelalex242 » Fri Jul 17, 2015 1:40 pm

In defense of the other interpretation, one of the biggest themes in Tolkien is that the world seems to degrade over time, and those that came before are mightier then people today.

Blubbo Baggins
Posts: 279
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2014 4:34 pm

Re: The First Age

Post by Blubbo Baggins » Fri Jul 17, 2015 3:09 pm

Angelalex242 wrote:In defense of the other interpretation, one of the biggest themes in Tolkien is that the world seems to degrade over time, and those that came before are mightier then people today.
I agree with this; though the tale may grow in the telling, as Glorelendil suggests, I think that this is a real theme in Tolkien's works.

With regards to actually playing a game in the 1st age, I really think it would be as fun for PCs to have the same "power level". In fact, in such a campaign, I would want to see mostly the role of men emphasized. Elves should perhaps be playable, but the might of the Noldor should still be a surprising, mysterious thing. It will add to the "largeness" and wonder of the world for the players. I actually think the limitations set in the RAW for players make the game more interesting, because overcoming limitations is fun.

If you can just use powers to overcome anything from the start (4e I'm looking at you!), you really lose a big fun factor.
Glorelendil wrote: Do you believe, for instance, that Methuselah actually lived to 800?
Not to completely derail this thread: it was 969.
Actually, the pre-flood world was vastly different than what we have now (actually even if one doesn't believe in a pre-flood world, if you pretend the story was true then the description of the world then is still quite different). I need to research this some more, but I have heard of scientists attempting to create a mini environment what that world was like, with a very high level of atmosphere, moisture, etc., and have put mayflies into it. Those flies, which typically live one week, lived much longer (a month? more?). Again, I need to look into this more, I am sharing some stories I have heard without looking into it directly first.

Glorelendil
Posts: 5160
Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 5:20 pm

Re: The First Age

Post by Glorelendil » Fri Jul 17, 2015 5:28 pm

Blubbo Baggins wrote:
Glorelendil wrote: Do you believe, for instance, that Methuselah actually lived to 800?
Not to completely derail this thread: it was 969.
Well then presumably he also lived to 800.

If not then I'm even more impressed.
The Munchkin Formerly Known as Elfcrusher
Journey Computer | Combat Simulator | Bestiary | Weapon Calculator

Glorelendil
Posts: 5160
Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 5:20 pm

Re: The First Age

Post by Glorelendil » Fri Jul 17, 2015 5:30 pm

Angelalex242 wrote:In defense of the other interpretation, one of the biggest themes in Tolkien is that the world seems to degrade over time, and those that came before are mightier then people today.
Yes, absolutely fair point. And, in the interest of full disclosure, I prefer the literalist interpretation. I like thinking of Fingolfin as a total badass. Balls o' mithril, as they say. (Where is that thread on cursing in Middle Earth?)
The Munchkin Formerly Known as Elfcrusher
Journey Computer | Combat Simulator | Bestiary | Weapon Calculator

Blubbo Baggins
Posts: 279
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2014 4:34 pm

Re: The First Age

Post by Blubbo Baggins » Fri Jul 17, 2015 5:31 pm

Glorelendil wrote:
Blubbo Baggins wrote:
Glorelendil wrote: Do you believe, for instance, that Methuselah actually lived to 800?
Not to completely derail this thread: it was 969.
Well then presumably he also lived to 800.

If not then I'm even more impressed.
Lol

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Wbweather and 4 guests