New Loremaster, Combat issues.
Re: New Loremaster, Combat issues.
Sorry if I seemed to be lecturing. It was mostly an excuse for me to post my second line in a serious discussion.
Jacob Rodgers, occasional nitwit.
This space intentionally blank.
This space intentionally blank.
- Random221B
- Posts: 62
- Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2014 3:49 pm
Re: New Loremaster, Combat issues.
Nope, didn't sound lecturing at all. No worries. I'm enjoying the discussion. My own apologies if I seem to be repeating myself more than I'm adding anything new to the conversation.zedturtle wrote:Sorry if I seemed to be lecturing. It was mostly an excuse for me to post my second line in a serious discussion.
-
- Posts: 3397
- Joined: Sun May 12, 2013 2:45 am
- Location: Lackawanna, NY
Re: New Loremaster, Combat issues.
I suppose that, instead of 'Woodmen', one could say 'Wood-folk'. However, another person might think that you are referring to the Ents.
"Far, far below the deepest delvings of the Dwarves, the world is gnawed by nameless things. Even Sauron knows them not. They are older than he."
Re: New Loremaster, Combat issues.
When a female "woodman" wants to identify herself, she can say she is "of the Woodmen."
- Random221B
- Posts: 62
- Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2014 3:49 pm
Re: New Loremaster, Combat issues.
Yes, I agree. As I said above "one of the Woodmen" (or as you say, just "of the Woodmen") sounds/works better than saying she is either "a Woodman" or "a Woodwoman." I didn't specifically plan/decide to start using "of/one of the Woodmen folk," it just came out of my mouth the first time, and I liked the sound of it, so I kept using it. "of the Woodmen" works...I just personally decided I liked the sound/feel of "Woodmen folk" better.Stormcrow wrote:When a female "woodman" wants to identify herself, she can say she is "of the Woodmen."
Re: New Loremaster, Combat issues.
I've had two female Woodmen PCs, one played by a female and another by a male. Though it sounds a bit awkward, I've described them as a "Woodwoman of Wilderland".
Glorelendil was already having trouble getting his head through the door...zedturtle wrote:No worries. Your thanks almost makes up for the fact that you called Glorelendil a celebrity and not me.
I don't know. You're going to have to get something wrong, rules-wise, one of these days. 99.994% accuracy could be a human, but it's extremely suspect.zedturtle wrote:* When one plays online, one can never be sure. The preponderance of evidence is that I'm not a super-evolved AI, but you never know...
Tale of Years for a second, lower-level group (in the same campaign).
Re: New Loremaster, Combat issues.
Zed, you are the best kind of celebrity - the approachable kind, with a sense of humor! Although if you're also an extremely advanced AI...should we start calling you Data?
Re: gendered labels. I also use Look-Out and Hunter rather than their gendered equivalents, and I have also struggled to come up with a gender-inclusive term for 'Woodmen'. I agree, 'Woodwoman' is awkward. I thought of using "of the Woodland Realm", but the Elves took that one for themselves. The compromise I've come up with is referring to them in print, at least, as the Wood-Men, using Tolkien's capitalized "Men" to mean humans. In my game, I try to present examples of women as well as men in positions of authority and respect; two of the seven Council members of Woodland Hall are women, the chief healer and the sister of the previous bearer of Wolfbiter, an accomplished shieldmaiden in her own right. I also have a woman playing a female Dwarf who presents as male to non-Dwarves. The player assumed at first that females were undervalued in the Dwarven cultures of Middle-Earth, and that may have been the case as Tolkien envisioned it, but I choose to disagree. I think that the reason Dwarven women mostly don't leave their halls by the Third Age is because they are so highly cherished - as lineage-holders and record-keepers, as well as for their wisdom, discernment and foresight.
I also appreciate C7 tremendously for avoiding stereotypes of female adventurers and images thereof. Just because we adore Professor Tolkien and his created world doesn't mean we have to adhere to his generation's unquestioned institutionalized sexism!
Re: gendered labels. I also use Look-Out and Hunter rather than their gendered equivalents, and I have also struggled to come up with a gender-inclusive term for 'Woodmen'. I agree, 'Woodwoman' is awkward. I thought of using "of the Woodland Realm", but the Elves took that one for themselves. The compromise I've come up with is referring to them in print, at least, as the Wood-Men, using Tolkien's capitalized "Men" to mean humans. In my game, I try to present examples of women as well as men in positions of authority and respect; two of the seven Council members of Woodland Hall are women, the chief healer and the sister of the previous bearer of Wolfbiter, an accomplished shieldmaiden in her own right. I also have a woman playing a female Dwarf who presents as male to non-Dwarves. The player assumed at first that females were undervalued in the Dwarven cultures of Middle-Earth, and that may have been the case as Tolkien envisioned it, but I choose to disagree. I think that the reason Dwarven women mostly don't leave their halls by the Third Age is because they are so highly cherished - as lineage-holders and record-keepers, as well as for their wisdom, discernment and foresight.
I also appreciate C7 tremendously for avoiding stereotypes of female adventurers and images thereof. Just because we adore Professor Tolkien and his created world doesn't mean we have to adhere to his generation's unquestioned institutionalized sexism!
- Random221B
- Posts: 62
- Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2014 3:49 pm
Re: New Loremaster, Combat issues.
Indeed!mirdanis wrote:I also appreciate C7 tremendously for avoiding stereotypes of female adventurers and images thereof. Just because we adore Professor Tolkien and his created world doesn't mean we have to adhere to his generation's unquestioned institutionalized sexism!
I like your thoughts on Dwarven women, and what their roles are in Dwarven society.
- Robin Smallburrow
- Posts: 564
- Joined: Mon May 13, 2013 10:35 am
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
Re: New Loremaster, Combat issues.
mirdanis
You are in fact spot on with your reasoning as to why dwarven women are hardly ever found 'outside' - IIRC in one of the History of Middle Earth books, Tolkien mentions this very reason - their scarcity meant that they were protected and cherished by their men-folk, so they were rarely allowed to leave. Picture the scene of a dwarven father with a rebellious daughter telling him she was 'going, no matter what' (actually I think this is what happened with Dis, but she was only able to travel I think because she had an 'escort')
Robin S.
You are in fact spot on with your reasoning as to why dwarven women are hardly ever found 'outside' - IIRC in one of the History of Middle Earth books, Tolkien mentions this very reason - their scarcity meant that they were protected and cherished by their men-folk, so they were rarely allowed to leave. Picture the scene of a dwarven father with a rebellious daughter telling him she was 'going, no matter what' (actually I think this is what happened with Dis, but she was only able to travel I think because she had an 'escort')
Robin S.
To access all my links for my TOR Resources - please click on this link >> http://bit.ly/1gjXkCo
-
- Posts: 3397
- Joined: Sun May 12, 2013 2:45 am
- Location: Lackawanna, NY
Re: New Loremaster, Combat issues.
Dís, in her early years, wouldn't have had much say in the matter. She was forced to flee Erebor with her kin in her tenth year and was probably dwelling in Dunland until after the War of the Dwarves and Orcs. Dís would still have been considered to be quite young when her father brought his followers to the Ered Luin in TA 2802. It seems likely that she might have remained in Thráin's (later Thorin's) Halls in the Blue Mountains until after 2941 when Durin's Folk in the Blue Mountains could return to Erebor.Robin Smallburrow wrote:mirdanis
You are in fact spot on with your reasoning as to why dwarven women are hardly ever found 'outside' - IIRC in one of the History of Middle Earth books, Tolkien mentions this very reason - their scarcity meant that they were protected and cherished by their men-folk, so they were rarely allowed to leave. Picture the scene of a dwarven father with a rebellious daughter telling him she was 'going, no matter what' (actually I think this is what happened with Dis, but she was only able to travel I think because she had an 'escort')
Robin S.
I have speculated that Dís might have returned to the Blue Mountains if she found remaining in Erebor unbearable; perhaps maintaining the Halls of Thorin as an embassy for the Folk of Durin in the western lands. If this was the case then she might have developed quite an independent streak in those later years.
"Far, far below the deepest delvings of the Dwarves, the world is gnawed by nameless things. Even Sauron knows them not. They are older than he."
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], feld and 6 guests