forums.cubicle7.co.uk
archive

mirkwoodfalcon wrote:

Jon Hodgson wrote:...TOR will remain an independent, supported line. We'll have some more TOR news this week.

We have extra resource in place to make this happen. We aren't taking resource from TOR to make the D&D supplements. The D&D game is very likely provide more resources for TOR. However the proof of the pudding will certainly rest in getting you more TOR supplements than last year. Which is our aim, and we're in an excellent position to do this.

Thank you for taking time to address these concerns. I feel much better about the announcement given your clarification, I know I personally appreciate your response and I'm sure many others will as well.
And more TOR supplements is always a good thing.

Glorelendil wrote:It better ALSO be in the usual high-quality C7 physical book format.

I'm going to start working on my dual-classed, dual-wielding Hobbit murderhobo Wizard right now.

Jon Hodgson wrote:I don't see why it wouldn't be.

Jon Hodgson wrote:All in a day's work for Answer-Questions-about-Middle-earth-D&D-for-4-Hours Man!

vilainn6 wrote:

Jon Hodgson wrote:Hey remember when we pretty much had to ban the topic of "dual wielding" on this forum? Those were the days!


To address the understandable concerns about the TOR release schedule, we're aware we will have to say this many times: TOR will remain an independent, supported line. We'll have some more TOR news this week.

I will believe it when I will see it. Now I am very suspicious that really you have that men power to run the two project all together. You still just released 2 book last years for TOR.

Also I am not a fan of DnD magic user in Middle Earth. You spent so much effort making a low magic setting with TOR, you are gonna throw this in the garbage to please the DnD crownd?

Jon Hodgson wrote:Or is the proof of the pudding under the crust? I can never remember.

Can we get a Hobbit to the D&D thread please? Customer waiting!