Rearward Stance Question
Rearward Stance Question
If a character is in rearward stance and an enemy uses great leap to attack him, does this mean that the character can no longer used ranged attacks since the enemy has engaged him in melee combat? If this is the case what would be the target number to hit the character?
-
- Posts: 1116
- Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2013 7:52 pm
- Location: Valinor
Re: Rearward Stance Question
Rearward counts as defensive stance when enemies leap in. If it's TN 12 to hit them, it's TN 12 to hit you. TOR is very fair like that.
It doesn't look like it negates rearward, though. So you can keep shooting away even if you enemies can fly or jump. Apparently, visually, you run and shoot while the enemy bounds or flies after you.
It doesn't look like it negates rearward, though. So you can keep shooting away even if you enemies can fly or jump. Apparently, visually, you run and shoot while the enemy bounds or flies after you.
Re: Rearward Stance Question
Good response, Angelalex.
Correct, it doesn't change your 'stance' or your ability to continue to shoot them; but you're not safe from being attacked either.
The added flavor text to visualize really helps hammer this point. Well said.
Robert
Correct, it doesn't change your 'stance' or your ability to continue to shoot them; but you're not safe from being attacked either.
The added flavor text to visualize really helps hammer this point. Well said.
Robert
- Indur Dawndeath
- Posts: 466
- Joined: Fri Feb 21, 2014 9:30 pm
- Location: Denmark
Re: Rearward Stance Question
That is a nice answer, but what happens when the adversary is an Attercop and the archer is seized.
I would say that in this case the Attercop has managed to force the archer into close combat, probably in defensive stance.
You agree?
I would say that in this case the Attercop has managed to force the archer into close combat, probably in defensive stance.
You agree?
One game to rule them all: TOR
Re: Rearward Stance Question
I would imagine that would be the case, but since the TN is the same (12), I think it's a wash.Indur Dawndeath wrote:That is a nice answer, but what happens when the adversary is an Attercop and the archer is seized.
I would say that in this case the Attercop has managed to force the archer into close combat, probably in defensive stance.
You agree?
Jacob Rodgers, occasional nitwit.
This space intentionally blank.
This space intentionally blank.
- Indur Dawndeath
- Posts: 466
- Joined: Fri Feb 21, 2014 9:30 pm
- Location: Denmark
Re: Rearward Stance Question
No, I think it is rather important, since it cost Hate to attack in Rearward stance.
In the case of Attercops, they have 2 Hate, so normally they will only take one shot at Ensnaring the Archer. Ensnare causes no damage, so if they have to spend Hate again to attack, then they are Weary. I don't think that makes sense.
But it is rather tough on the archer to be Seized and forced out of Rearward, so I don't know...
In the case of Attercops, they have 2 Hate, so normally they will only take one shot at Ensnaring the Archer. Ensnare causes no damage, so if they have to spend Hate again to attack, then they are Weary. I don't think that makes sense.
But it is rather tough on the archer to be Seized and forced out of Rearward, so I don't know...
One game to rule them all: TOR
- Indur Dawndeath
- Posts: 466
- Joined: Fri Feb 21, 2014 9:30 pm
- Location: Denmark
Re: Rearward Stance Question
And when they are out of Hate, then they cannot attack, even if he is still Seized.
In my book it must mean that the archer is forced into close combat in Defensive stance.
Any objections?
In my book it must mean that the archer is forced into close combat in Defensive stance.
Any objections?
One game to rule them all: TOR
Re: Rearward Stance Question
Forcing someone out of rearward seems to be more than what it hinted at. I'm wondering what the "This replaces their normal attack" bit on Great Leap means. Is that just to clarify that they don't get a (second) free attack that round?
I'd thinking you just spend one Hate to leap to someone in Rearward stance, then - within that leaping attack - roll Ensnare as the actual attack roll for that round.
I'd thinking you just spend one Hate to leap to someone in Rearward stance, then - within that leaping attack - roll Ensnare as the actual attack roll for that round.
Tale of Years for a second, lower-level group (in the same campaign).
- Indur Dawndeath
- Posts: 466
- Joined: Fri Feb 21, 2014 9:30 pm
- Location: Denmark
Re: Rearward Stance Question
I think it is clear that they don't get an extra attack.Majestic wrote:Forcing someone out of rearward seems to be more than what it hinted at. I'm wondering what the "This replaces their normal attack" bit on Great Leap means. Is that just to clarify that they don't get a (second) free attack that round?
I'd thinking you just spend one Hate to leap to someone in Rearward stance, then - within that leaping attack - roll Ensnare as the actual attack roll for that round.
Another way to handle this is to have the Attercop remain in Rearward stance, if and only if it has Seized the archer. That way no other enemy can engage the archer, unless they also have Great Leap or Fell Speed.
And if the Archer escapes with an Athletics TN10+Attribute, then he is free and the Attercops have to use Great Leap again..
One game to rule them all: TOR
Re: Rearward Stance Question
So I'm still wondering what "This replaces their normal attack" means?Indur Dawndeath wrote:I think it is clear that they don't get an extra attack.Majestic wrote:Forcing someone out of rearward seems to be more than what it hinted at. I'm wondering what the "This replaces their normal attack" bit on Great Leap means. Is that just to clarify that they don't get a (second) free attack that round?
I'd thinking you just spend one Hate to leap to someone in Rearward stance, then - within that leaping attack - roll Ensnare as the actual attack roll for that round.
Another way to handle this is to have the Attercop remain in Rearward stance, if and only if it has Seized the archer. That way no other enemy can engage the archer, unless they also have Great Leap or Fell Speed.
And if the Archer escapes with an Athletics TN10+Attribute, then he is free and the Attercops have to use Great Leap again..
And what does the Attercop roll (what attack does it make) for their turn, on the action where they leap to the character in Rearward?
Tale of Years for a second, lower-level group (in the same campaign).
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests