The only reference that I can think of other then the vambrace is the the haradarim, who dies in the two towers by Faramire's men, has over lapping plates as armor.
If that doesn't work then I would like to purchase a chest vambrace!
![Wink ;)](images/smilies/icon_e_wink.gif)
That's how I would introduce plate armour in the game (if introduced it must): a Reward for the Knight of Dol Amroth Heroic Culture -which could be a variant of the Men of Minas Tirith-. And I'd call it "Polished Full Harness" or the like, not directly "Plate Armour". Just to get some laughter reading through the comments in the forums.zedturtle wrote: ↑Tue May 23, 2017 11:46 pmI would not say that there is definitive proof that plate armour as we commonly understand it is clearly attested to. I would say that if someone wanted to have a special reward... an heirloom of great value and special significance... that it could be conceivable that such a unique thing exists. After all, Hobbits have umbrellas and handkerchiefs, and clocks that fit on mantles.![]()
That, specially Mass Combat rules, I think would go well in a Gondor-to-Umbar book.
I wouldn't go that far. At first his historical models lay in the early (or at latest - high) medieval era rather than late with classic plate armour (e.g. 14cth century onwards). And given plate armour's abundance in english museums and castles, it is quite unlikely that its connotations were unknown to Tolkien.
That and the overlapping plates that the Haradrim warrior wore when he was killed in the two towers.
Mail can indeed shine.Tolwen wrote: ↑Wed May 24, 2017 5:18 amThus - IMO - isolated ambiguous passages referring to armour are insufficient evidence to the matter. You have to gather all the relevant passages and from this whole body of evidence seen in context draw the most likely conclusions. For example, Thorin & Co are said to have rushed out to the Battle of Five Armies in "shining armour" (as mentioned in a previous post) and this *might* be seen as plate armour. Earlier in the text, when Bilbo enters Smaug's chamber, the room is described and its walls are adorned by (beside other weaponry) "coats of mail" (but no word of "plate" or something to that effect). Thus it is more likely that the armour in this room is typical and representative of what Thorin & Co later wore as well.
I think you misunderstand me. I'm not saying Tolkien was wholly ignorant of armor, I'm saying he hadn't made a study of it and wasn't trying to get it historically accurate. He freely mixed all sorts of elements together to create his stories: Victorian-technology hobbits, Norse Edda dwarves, Anglo-Saxon Rohirrim, Romanesque Numenoreans, elves who created weapons and armor before they had any practical use for them. It's all a mishmash. Whatever served the story he was telling got thrown in.Tolwen wrote: ↑Wed May 24, 2017 5:18 amI wouldn't go that far. At first his historical models lay in the early (or at latest - high) medieval era rather than late with classic plate armour (e.g. 14cth century onwards). And given plate armour's abundance in english museums and castles, it is quite unlikely that its connotations were unknown to Tolkien.
A "corslet of overlapping brazen plates" sounds more like a form of bronze scale mail or lamellar armour than anything else. In any case, not the half-plate or full-plate of medieval romances (which would possibly not have been practical for a warrior fighting from the back of an Oliphaunt).
Users browsing this forum: beardo1976, Cleggster and 5 guests