Quick Tales From Wilderland Question

Adventure in the world of J.R.R. Tolkien’s The Lord of the Rings. Learn more at our website: http://www.cubicle7.co.uk/our-games/the-one-ring/
Post Reply
Shieldmaiden
Posts: 40
Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2014 12:14 pm

Quick Tales From Wilderland Question

Post by Shieldmaiden » Sun Feb 02, 2014 1:52 pm

In "A Darkness in the Marches" why on Middle-Earth would the heroes choose to take a boat upriver instead of just walking? It's a forty mile trip through easy terrain, or moderate if they decide to cross the river first. Going by boat turns a 2-3 day journey into a 4-8 day one. I just can't see why it's the suggested way of doing it.
A tale is but half told when only one person tells it.

The Saga of Grettir the Strong, chapter 46

DavetheLost
Posts: 490
Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2013 1:08 pm

Re: Quick Tales From Wilderland Question

Post by DavetheLost » Sun Feb 02, 2014 3:21 pm

Only thing I can think of off hand is that traveling by river means you don't have to worry about nasty things living on the banks, except when you camp. It is easier to row/paddle than it is to bushwhacked cross country. You can also take a lot more gear with you.

But if it doubles your travel time, I'm not sure it's entirely worth the trade offs.

Shieldmaiden
Posts: 40
Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2014 12:14 pm

Re: Quick Tales From Wilderland Question

Post by Shieldmaiden » Sun Feb 02, 2014 3:34 pm

Yep, if it was dangerous or difficult territory, or the heroes needed to transport a large amount of goods, it would make perfect sense. As it stands, it just seems a waste of time. Unless I'm missing something.
A tale is but half told when only one person tells it.

The Saga of Grettir the Strong, chapter 46

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Butterfingers and 4 guests