forums.cubicle7.co.uk
archive

In "A Darkness in the Marches" why on Middle-Earth would the heroes choose to take a boat upriver instead of just walking? It's a forty mile trip through easy terrain, or moderate if they decide to cross the river first. Going by boat turns a 2-3 day journey into a 4-8 day one. I just can't see why it's the suggested way of doing it.

Only thing I can think of off hand is that traveling by river means you don't have to worry about nasty things living on the banks, except when you camp. It is easier to row/paddle than it is to bushwhacked cross country. You can also take a lot more gear with you.

But if it doubles your travel time, I'm not sure it's entirely worth the trade offs.

Yep, if it was dangerous or difficult territory, or the heroes needed to transport a large amount of goods, it would make perfect sense. As it stands, it just seems a waste of time. Unless I'm missing something.