The Attention of Sauron (Zed's new EoM)

The unique One Ring rules set invites tinkering and secondary creation. Whilst The One Ring works brilliantly as written, we provide this forum for those who want to make their own home-brewed versions of the rules. Note that none of these should be taken as 'official'.
User avatar
Rich H
Posts: 4153
Joined: Wed May 08, 2013 8:19 pm
Location: Sheffield, UK

Re: The Attention of Sauron (Zed's new EoM)

Post by Rich H » Sun Jun 28, 2015 12:13 pm

zedturtle wrote: 10 - HE
12 - DU
14 - ME, MM, DW
16 - HO
This 'un. Keep High Elves distinct to Dunedain and make Mirkwood Elves the same as middle-men and Dwarves.
TOR resources thread: viewtopic.php?f=7&t=62
TOR miniatures thread: viewtopic.php?t=885

Fellowship of the Free Tale of Years: viewtopic.php?f=7&t=8318

User avatar
Rich H
Posts: 4153
Joined: Wed May 08, 2013 8:19 pm
Location: Sheffield, UK

Re: The Attention of Sauron (Zed's new EoM)

Post by Rich H » Sun Jun 28, 2015 12:15 pm

zedturtle wrote:Should Hunt Threshold in this system be modified by the Hunt Modifier table on page 114 of Rivendell?

I'm thinking, yes.
I'd agree. I like having circumstantial modifiers and think these are scaled okay with the values you're using as those roughly match to the terrain zones less starting EA of the RAW that you're replacing with these house rules.
TOR resources thread: viewtopic.php?f=7&t=62
TOR miniatures thread: viewtopic.php?t=885

Fellowship of the Free Tale of Years: viewtopic.php?f=7&t=8318

Angelalex242
Posts: 1116
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2013 7:52 pm
Location: Valinor

Re: The Attention of Sauron (Zed's new EoM)

Post by Angelalex242 » Sun Jun 28, 2015 2:02 pm

zedturtle wrote:
Angelalex242 wrote:Better idea:

Starting Value is +1 per flaw, not +1 per permanent shadow.
Hmmm... that's more complicated to explain and not as elegant. What Permanent Shadow are you thinking shouldn't contribute?
Things like Lesser Ring. High Elves are already on the top of Sauron's list. Let's not have picking a Reward make it worse.

User avatar
zedturtle
Posts: 3289
Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2014 12:03 am

Re: The Attention of Sauron (Zed's new EoM)

Post by zedturtle » Sun Jun 28, 2015 2:55 pm

I wonder whether or not things like the Lesser Ring should count as a remarkable item; I suppose I would leave it open to LM interpretation.
Jacob Rodgers, occasional nitwit.

This space intentionally blank.

User avatar
zedturtle
Posts: 3289
Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2014 12:03 am

Re: The Attention of Sauron (Zed's new EoM)

Post by zedturtle » Sun Jun 28, 2015 4:42 pm

Crossposting from the Magic thread, here's my latest version:
zedturtle wrote:Image

Image
Jacob Rodgers, occasional nitwit.

This space intentionally blank.

Blubbo Baggins
Posts: 279
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2014 4:34 pm

Re: The Attention of Sauron (Zed's new EoM)

Post by Blubbo Baggins » Mon Jun 29, 2015 3:52 pm

This is the most elegant change suggested for the Eye Awareness. Good work!

So if going from Free Lands to Wilderness, that increases the Awareness, but the Threshold does not change, correct?

User avatar
zedturtle
Posts: 3289
Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2014 12:03 am

Re: The Attention of Sauron (Zed's new EoM)

Post by zedturtle » Mon Jun 29, 2015 4:18 pm

Blubbo Baggins wrote:This is the most elegant change suggested for the Eye Awareness. Good work!

So if going from Free Lands to Wilderness, that increases the Awareness, but the Threshold does not change, correct?
Right. I actually scaled back the impact of transitions, but I think I'm going to out it back in, otherwise the numbers are a bit wonky for low to middle range adventurers.
Jacob Rodgers, occasional nitwit.

This space intentionally blank.

User avatar
Rich H
Posts: 4153
Joined: Wed May 08, 2013 8:19 pm
Location: Sheffield, UK

Re: The Attention of Sauron (Zed's new EoM)

Post by Rich H » Tue Jun 30, 2015 11:09 am

Angelalex242 wrote:Things like Lesser Ring. High Elves are already on the top of Sauron's list. Let's not have picking a Reward make it worse.
If they carry around a Lesser Ring, that's extra weight.
zedturtle wrote:I wonder whether or not things like the Lesser Ring should count as a remarkable item; I suppose I would leave it open to LM interpretation.
Lesser Ring's add a Shadow point to the character so I think from a design perspective they should be affect Sauronic Awareness as part of a character's SP total or because of the item but not both. Personally I'd adopt your initial rules and go with the shadow route as it's clear and simple - if you go the remarkable item way then the first question that needs answering is: what makes an item, remarkable? Which is likely to be inconsistently applied.
TOR resources thread: viewtopic.php?f=7&t=62
TOR miniatures thread: viewtopic.php?t=885

Fellowship of the Free Tale of Years: viewtopic.php?f=7&t=8318

User avatar
zedturtle
Posts: 3289
Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2014 12:03 am

Re: The Attention of Sauron (Zed's new EoM)

Post by zedturtle » Tue Jun 30, 2015 11:29 pm

Rich H wrote:Lesser Ring's add a Shadow point to the character so I think from a design perspective they should be affect Sauronic Awareness as part of a character's SP total or because of the item but not both. Personally I'd adopt your initial rules and go with the shadow route as it's clear and simple - if you go the remarkable item way then the first question that needs answering is: what makes an item, remarkable? Which is likely to be inconsistently applied.
Hmmm. I'm split in my mind about whether or not Permanent Shadow should impact Eye Awareness. There are arguments to be made on both sides. One thing I do like about the 'remarkable magical items' line is that it is open to interpretation, which I think fits the rules very well. As long as LMs are self-consistent, I don't think that a little bit of variation will hurt things too badly.

If I manage through my fatigue issues, I might well have a new version in a day or two.
Jacob Rodgers, occasional nitwit.

This space intentionally blank.

Glorelendil
Posts: 5160
Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 5:20 pm

Re: The Attention of Sauron (Zed's new EoM)

Post by Glorelendil » Tue Jun 30, 2015 11:35 pm

How about "two or more enchanted qualities" as a rule for "remarkable" items?
The Munchkin Formerly Known as Elfcrusher
Journey Computer | Combat Simulator | Bestiary | Weapon Calculator

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests