This 'un. Keep High Elves distinct to Dunedain and make Mirkwood Elves the same as middle-men and Dwarves.zedturtle wrote: 10 - HE
12 - DU
14 - ME, MM, DW
16 - HO
The Attention of Sauron (Zed's new EoM)
Re: The Attention of Sauron (Zed's new EoM)
TOR resources thread: viewtopic.php?f=7&t=62
TOR miniatures thread: viewtopic.php?t=885
Fellowship of the Free Tale of Years: viewtopic.php?f=7&t=8318
TOR miniatures thread: viewtopic.php?t=885
Fellowship of the Free Tale of Years: viewtopic.php?f=7&t=8318
Re: The Attention of Sauron (Zed's new EoM)
I'd agree. I like having circumstantial modifiers and think these are scaled okay with the values you're using as those roughly match to the terrain zones less starting EA of the RAW that you're replacing with these house rules.zedturtle wrote:Should Hunt Threshold in this system be modified by the Hunt Modifier table on page 114 of Rivendell?
I'm thinking, yes.
TOR resources thread: viewtopic.php?f=7&t=62
TOR miniatures thread: viewtopic.php?t=885
Fellowship of the Free Tale of Years: viewtopic.php?f=7&t=8318
TOR miniatures thread: viewtopic.php?t=885
Fellowship of the Free Tale of Years: viewtopic.php?f=7&t=8318
-
- Posts: 1116
- Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2013 7:52 pm
- Location: Valinor
Re: The Attention of Sauron (Zed's new EoM)
Things like Lesser Ring. High Elves are already on the top of Sauron's list. Let's not have picking a Reward make it worse.zedturtle wrote:Hmmm... that's more complicated to explain and not as elegant. What Permanent Shadow are you thinking shouldn't contribute?Angelalex242 wrote:Better idea:
Starting Value is +1 per flaw, not +1 per permanent shadow.
Re: The Attention of Sauron (Zed's new EoM)
I wonder whether or not things like the Lesser Ring should count as a remarkable item; I suppose I would leave it open to LM interpretation.
Jacob Rodgers, occasional nitwit.
This space intentionally blank.
This space intentionally blank.
Re: The Attention of Sauron (Zed's new EoM)
Crossposting from the Magic thread, here's my latest version:
zedturtle wrote:
Jacob Rodgers, occasional nitwit.
This space intentionally blank.
This space intentionally blank.
-
- Posts: 279
- Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2014 4:34 pm
Re: The Attention of Sauron (Zed's new EoM)
This is the most elegant change suggested for the Eye Awareness. Good work!
So if going from Free Lands to Wilderness, that increases the Awareness, but the Threshold does not change, correct?
So if going from Free Lands to Wilderness, that increases the Awareness, but the Threshold does not change, correct?
Re: The Attention of Sauron (Zed's new EoM)
Right. I actually scaled back the impact of transitions, but I think I'm going to out it back in, otherwise the numbers are a bit wonky for low to middle range adventurers.Blubbo Baggins wrote:This is the most elegant change suggested for the Eye Awareness. Good work!
So if going from Free Lands to Wilderness, that increases the Awareness, but the Threshold does not change, correct?
Jacob Rodgers, occasional nitwit.
This space intentionally blank.
This space intentionally blank.
Re: The Attention of Sauron (Zed's new EoM)
If they carry around a Lesser Ring, that's extra weight.Angelalex242 wrote:Things like Lesser Ring. High Elves are already on the top of Sauron's list. Let's not have picking a Reward make it worse.
Lesser Ring's add a Shadow point to the character so I think from a design perspective they should be affect Sauronic Awareness as part of a character's SP total or because of the item but not both. Personally I'd adopt your initial rules and go with the shadow route as it's clear and simple - if you go the remarkable item way then the first question that needs answering is: what makes an item, remarkable? Which is likely to be inconsistently applied.zedturtle wrote:I wonder whether or not things like the Lesser Ring should count as a remarkable item; I suppose I would leave it open to LM interpretation.
TOR resources thread: viewtopic.php?f=7&t=62
TOR miniatures thread: viewtopic.php?t=885
Fellowship of the Free Tale of Years: viewtopic.php?f=7&t=8318
TOR miniatures thread: viewtopic.php?t=885
Fellowship of the Free Tale of Years: viewtopic.php?f=7&t=8318
Re: The Attention of Sauron (Zed's new EoM)
Hmmm. I'm split in my mind about whether or not Permanent Shadow should impact Eye Awareness. There are arguments to be made on both sides. One thing I do like about the 'remarkable magical items' line is that it is open to interpretation, which I think fits the rules very well. As long as LMs are self-consistent, I don't think that a little bit of variation will hurt things too badly.Rich H wrote:Lesser Ring's add a Shadow point to the character so I think from a design perspective they should be affect Sauronic Awareness as part of a character's SP total or because of the item but not both. Personally I'd adopt your initial rules and go with the shadow route as it's clear and simple - if you go the remarkable item way then the first question that needs answering is: what makes an item, remarkable? Which is likely to be inconsistently applied.
If I manage through my fatigue issues, I might well have a new version in a day or two.
Jacob Rodgers, occasional nitwit.
This space intentionally blank.
This space intentionally blank.
-
- Posts: 5160
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 5:20 pm
Re: The Attention of Sauron (Zed's new EoM)
How about "two or more enchanted qualities" as a rule for "remarkable" items?
The Munchkin Formerly Known as Elfcrusher
Journey Computer | Combat Simulator | Bestiary | Weapon Calculator
Journey Computer | Combat Simulator | Bestiary | Weapon Calculator
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests