On pg 193 of the Revised rules, it gives the steps for the Company to follow during the Fellowship Phase as follows:
Choose Destination
Standing Upkeep
Spend Experience Points
Spend Advancement Points
Choose Undertakings
Now some of the Undertakings allow characters to purchase skill levels cheaper than usual e.g. (pg 122 of the Adventurer's Companion) Conferring with Gandalf, Saruman or Radagast to purchase various skill levels at half cost of Advancement points.
I allow Undertakings to be performed first, if requested, so that the benefits of purchasing skills are obtained in the current Fellowship Phase rather than the following one. I can imagine that arguments could be made for thinking that:
a) previous experiences (i.e. Advancement points already gained) could be applied to the new insight (i.e. Undertaking with learned person such as the Istari) OR
b) the new insight (i.e. Undertaking with learned person) takes place first and only then can new experiences (i.e. Advancement points gained after that) can use the new way of learning.
Has anyone other LM not stuck to the listed order of steps in the FP like this?
Mixing up Fellowship Phase steps
- Winterwolf
- Posts: 78
- Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2015 1:14 pm
- Location: Adelaide, Australia
Re: Mixing up Fellowship Phase steps
I allow the change if it fits the narrative. I'm not strict with the order during the FP: some players already know what Undertaking they'll take before even knowing where to spend the FP, or where to spend their XPs and APs. We go in any order once all have decide if they'll stay together or disband.
Re: Mixing up Fellowship Phase steps
We do it the same way. I allow complete flexibility in what order they do things in the Fellowship Phase. It's supposed to be player-driven, after all.
Adventure Summaries for my long-running group (currently playing through The Darkening of Mirkwood/Mirkwood Campaign), and the Tale of Years for a second, lower-level group (in the same campaign).
- Robin Smallburrow
- Posts: 564
- Joined: Mon May 13, 2013 10:35 am
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
Re: Mixing up Fellowship Phase steps
I allow the change for an obvious reason: Opening X as a Sanctuary is an Undertaking, and many other Undertakings etc. get bonuses if the PC is at a Sanctuary. So my players usually do the 'Open X as a Sanctuary' first, then do the other things (Heal Corruption etc.) they want to do. I don't have a problem (usually) with this, as it makes sense narratively (they are spending their initial time getting to know people).
Robin S.
Robin S.
To access all my links for my TOR Resources - please click on this link >> http://bit.ly/1gjXkCo
Re: Mixing up Fellowship Phase steps
Same here. Follow the order in the book as a guideline and nothing else. If it makes sense to approach in a different order and allow for undertakings to affect the cost of purchasing skills, etc then I allow it.
TOR resources thread: viewtopic.php?f=7&t=62
TOR miniatures thread: viewtopic.php?t=885
Fellowship of the Free Tale of Years: viewtopic.php?f=7&t=8318
TOR miniatures thread: viewtopic.php?t=885
Fellowship of the Free Tale of Years: viewtopic.php?f=7&t=8318
- Winterwolf
- Posts: 78
- Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2015 1:14 pm
- Location: Adelaide, Australia
Re: Mixing up Fellowship Phase steps
It all seems to make sense.
I remember having this dilemma previously and coming across an obvious situation where it should be allowed but I couldn't remember the situation.
Robin's example of opening a Sanctuary was the situation that I had previously come across.
Thanks Robin!
It is interesting that the Fellowship Phase steps are stated fairly rigidly but don't always work well if followed.
Can there be a reason to stick to that order in particular situations, I wonder?
I remember having this dilemma previously and coming across an obvious situation where it should be allowed but I couldn't remember the situation.
Robin's example of opening a Sanctuary was the situation that I had previously come across.
Thanks Robin!
It is interesting that the Fellowship Phase steps are stated fairly rigidly but don't always work well if followed.
Can there be a reason to stick to that order in particular situations, I wonder?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests