Mixing up Fellowship Phase steps

Adventure in the world of J.R.R. Tolkien’s The Lord of the Rings. Learn more at our website: http://www.cubicle7.co.uk/our-games/the-one-ring/
Post Reply
User avatar
Winterwolf
Posts: 78
Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2015 1:14 pm
Location: Adelaide, Australia

Mixing up Fellowship Phase steps

Post by Winterwolf » Fri Mar 23, 2018 2:28 pm

On pg 193 of the Revised rules, it gives the steps for the Company to follow during the Fellowship Phase as follows:
Choose Destination
Standing Upkeep
Spend Experience Points
Spend Advancement Points
Choose Undertakings

Now some of the Undertakings allow characters to purchase skill levels cheaper than usual e.g. (pg 122 of the Adventurer's Companion) Conferring with Gandalf, Saruman or Radagast to purchase various skill levels at half cost of Advancement points.
I allow Undertakings to be performed first, if requested, so that the benefits of purchasing skills are obtained in the current Fellowship Phase rather than the following one. I can imagine that arguments could be made for thinking that:
a) previous experiences (i.e. Advancement points already gained) could be applied to the new insight (i.e. Undertaking with learned person such as the Istari) OR
b) the new insight (i.e. Undertaking with learned person) takes place first and only then can new experiences (i.e. Advancement points gained after that) can use the new way of learning.

Has anyone other LM not stuck to the listed order of steps in the FP like this?

User avatar
Falenthal
Posts: 2273
Joined: Sun Feb 02, 2014 8:46 am
Location: Girona (Spain)
Contact:

Re: Mixing up Fellowship Phase steps

Post by Falenthal » Fri Mar 23, 2018 2:56 pm

I allow the change if it fits the narrative. I'm not strict with the order during the FP: some players already know what Undertaking they'll take before even knowing where to spend the FP, or where to spend their XPs and APs. We go in any order once all have decide if they'll stay together or disband.

User avatar
Majestic
Posts: 1807
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2014 5:47 pm
Location: Seattle, Washington

Re: Mixing up Fellowship Phase steps

Post by Majestic » Fri Mar 23, 2018 10:06 pm

We do it the same way. I allow complete flexibility in what order they do things in the Fellowship Phase. It's supposed to be player-driven, after all.
Adventure Summaries for my long-running group (currently playing through The Darkening of Mirkwood/Mirkwood Campaign), and the Tale of Years for a second, lower-level group (in the same campaign).

User avatar
Robin Smallburrow
Posts: 564
Joined: Mon May 13, 2013 10:35 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: Mixing up Fellowship Phase steps

Post by Robin Smallburrow » Sun Mar 25, 2018 10:28 am

I allow the change for an obvious reason: Opening X as a Sanctuary is an Undertaking, and many other Undertakings etc. get bonuses if the PC is at a Sanctuary. So my players usually do the 'Open X as a Sanctuary' first, then do the other things (Heal Corruption etc.) they want to do. I don't have a problem (usually) with this, as it makes sense narratively (they are spending their initial time getting to know people).

Robin S.
To access all my links for my TOR Resources - please click on this link >> http://bit.ly/1gjXkCo

User avatar
Rich H
Posts: 4156
Joined: Wed May 08, 2013 8:19 pm
Location: Sheffield, UK

Re: Mixing up Fellowship Phase steps

Post by Rich H » Sun Mar 25, 2018 1:01 pm

Same here. Follow the order in the book as a guideline and nothing else. If it makes sense to approach in a different order and allow for undertakings to affect the cost of purchasing skills, etc then I allow it.
TOR resources thread: viewtopic.php?f=7&t=62
TOR miniatures thread: viewtopic.php?t=885

Fellowship of the Free Tale of Years: viewtopic.php?f=7&t=8318

User avatar
Winterwolf
Posts: 78
Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2015 1:14 pm
Location: Adelaide, Australia

Re: Mixing up Fellowship Phase steps

Post by Winterwolf » Mon Mar 26, 2018 10:30 am

It all seems to make sense.
I remember having this dilemma previously and coming across an obvious situation where it should be allowed but I couldn't remember the situation.
Robin's example of opening a Sanctuary was the situation that I had previously come across.
Thanks Robin!

It is interesting that the Fellowship Phase steps are stated fairly rigidly but don't always work well if followed.
Can there be a reason to stick to that order in particular situations, I wonder?

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests