Body Attribute vs. Heart Attribute: a pugilist consideration

Adventure in the world of J.R.R. Tolkien’s The Lord of the Rings. Learn more at our website: http://www.cubicle7.co.uk/our-games/the-one-ring/
PipeSmoker
Posts: 49
Joined: Thu Oct 31, 2013 4:26 pm

Re: Body Attribute vs. Heart Attribute: a pugilist considera

Post by PipeSmoker » Wed Mar 19, 2014 12:59 am

Another interesting take, still considering both physical prowess and strong will as factors for Endurance, would be to recalculate (mostly lowering) basic Endurance ratings for each Culture and add to that both Body and Heart attributes. This is not done to change what matters, but to help even things out a bit.
I'd like to see characters with higher Body get a little End benefit compared to others of the same stock.

I agree that Elves have the worst End-Hope outline and am not completely at ease with Woodmen designed so different than other humans... those in particular could benefit from some tinkering.
Thoughts?

Corvo
Posts: 849
Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 12:02 pm

Re: Body Attribute vs. Heart Attribute: a pugilist considera

Post by Corvo » Wed Mar 19, 2014 12:46 pm

Another house rule I use is that the weapon's damage is based on the user's Strenght:

A sword or spear etc does damage=body
Long sword damage= body+2
Etc...
(some reworking was needed for dagger and short sword)
This way high body is a more immediate advantage.

Beleg
Posts: 204
Joined: Thu May 09, 2013 1:11 pm

Re: Body Attribute vs. Heart Attribute: a pugilist considera

Post by Beleg » Wed Mar 19, 2014 4:56 pm

I just posted this in the armor thread (I'm catching up on my forum reading):
After a bit of debate I house ruled that when calculating encumbrance, players add up the weight of their equipment then subtract their Body score

Glorelendil
Posts: 5162
Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 5:20 pm

Re: Body Attribute vs. Heart Attribute: a pugilist considera

Post by Glorelendil » Wed Mar 19, 2014 5:32 pm

Beleg wrote:I just posted this in the armor thread (I'm catching up on my forum reading):
After a bit of debate I house ruled that when calculating encumbrance, players add up the weight of their equipment then subtract their Body score
I'm going to start adding some of these house rules as options in my sim. I'm really curious about their impact. This might be a good one; nice and simple.
The Munchkin Formerly Known as Elfcrusher
Journey Computer | Combat Simulator | Bestiary | Weapon Calculator

Corvo
Posts: 849
Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 12:02 pm

Re: Body Attribute vs. Heart Attribute: a pugilist considera

Post by Corvo » Wed Mar 19, 2014 6:26 pm

Beleg wrote:I just posted this in the armor thread (I'm catching up on my forum reading):
After a bit of debate I house ruled that when calculating encumbrance, players add up the weight of their equipment then subtract their Body score
Nice, if you have no Dwarf in your group. Unless I'm wrong, their cultural virtue becomes garbage.

User avatar
Rich H
Posts: 4159
Joined: Wed May 08, 2013 8:19 pm
Location: Sheffield, UK

Re: Body Attribute vs. Heart Attribute: a pugilist considera

Post by Rich H » Wed Mar 19, 2014 6:30 pm

Corvo wrote:
Beleg wrote:I just posted this in the armor thread (I'm catching up on my forum reading):
After a bit of debate I house ruled that when calculating encumbrance, players add up the weight of their equipment then subtract their Body score
Nice, if you have no Dwarf in your group. Unless I'm wrong, their cultural virtue becomes garbage.
... There cultural blessing reduces Encumbrance by their favoured Heart I believe so they would get the benefit of Body as well with this house rule.
TOR resources thread: viewtopic.php?f=7&t=62
TOR miniatures thread: viewtopic.php?t=885

Fellowship of the Free Tale of Years: viewtopic.php?f=7&t=8318

User avatar
Woodclaw
Posts: 408
Joined: Fri Dec 27, 2013 1:48 pm
Location: Como, Italia

Re: Body Attribute vs. Heart Attribute: a pugilist considera

Post by Woodclaw » Wed Mar 19, 2014 6:47 pm

Rich H wrote:
Corvo wrote:
Beleg wrote:I just posted this in the armor thread (I'm catching up on my forum reading):
After a bit of debate I house ruled that when calculating encumbrance, players add up the weight of their equipment then subtract their Body score
Nice, if you have no Dwarf in your group. Unless I'm wrong, their cultural virtue becomes garbage.
... There cultural blessing reduces Encumbrance by their favoured Heart I believe so they would get the benefit of Body as well with this house rule.
I believe that this way they got double discount.
"What is the point of having free will if one cannot occasionally spit in the eye of destiny?" ("Gentleman" John Marcone)

User avatar
Rich H
Posts: 4159
Joined: Wed May 08, 2013 8:19 pm
Location: Sheffield, UK

Re: Body Attribute vs. Heart Attribute: a pugilist considera

Post by Rich H » Wed Mar 19, 2014 7:04 pm

Woodclaw wrote:I believe that this way they got double discount.
The reduction relates to two different attributes and if it was a double discount it wouldn't mean their cultural blessing "becomes garbage", it means that they benefit from two bonuses to reduce encumbrance whereas other races get one bonus which is comparable to the RAW - ie, 1 bonus for dwarves vs. 0 bonus for other races. The house rule is just increasing the gap between wearied and max Endurance for all cultures not just dwarves but is maintaining their advantage as they get the benefits of their cultural blessing plus this house rule.
TOR resources thread: viewtopic.php?f=7&t=62
TOR miniatures thread: viewtopic.php?t=885

Fellowship of the Free Tale of Years: viewtopic.php?f=7&t=8318

Corvo
Posts: 849
Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 12:02 pm

Re: Body Attribute vs. Heart Attribute: a pugilist considera

Post by Corvo » Wed Mar 19, 2014 7:31 pm

Rich H wrote:
Woodclaw wrote:I believe that this way they got double discount.
The reduction relates to two different attributes and if it was a double discount it wouldn't mean their cultural blessing "becomes garbage", it means that they benefit from two bonuses to reduce encumbrance whereas other races get one bonus which is comparable to the RAW - ie, 1 bonus for dwarves vs. 0 bonus for other races. The house rule is just increasing the gap between wearied and max Endurance for all cultures not just dwarves but is maintaining their advantage as they get the benefits of their cultural blessing plus this house rule.
Did they stack? Ok, Dwarves maintain their advantage.
Otherwise they are shafted.

Edit: by the way, I apologize with Beran for the "garbage" term. Not native speaker, I didn't realized at first that it can be meant as dismissive or offensive.

User avatar
Rich H
Posts: 4159
Joined: Wed May 08, 2013 8:19 pm
Location: Sheffield, UK

Re: Body Attribute vs. Heart Attribute: a pugilist considera

Post by Rich H » Wed Mar 19, 2014 7:35 pm

Corvo wrote:
Rich H wrote:The reduction relates to two different attributes and if it was a double discount it wouldn't mean their cultural blessing "becomes garbage", it means that they benefit from two bonuses to reduce encumbrance whereas other races get one bonus which is comparable to the RAW - ie, 1 bonus for dwarves vs. 0 bonus for other races. The house rule is just increasing the gap between wearied and max Endurance for all cultures not just dwarves but is maintaining their advantage as they get the benefits of their cultural blessing plus this house rule.
Did they stack? Ok, Dwarves maintain their advantage.
Otherwise they are shafted.
... That's the way I'd read it, otherwise like you say, dwarves would be shafted.
TOR resources thread: viewtopic.php?f=7&t=62
TOR miniatures thread: viewtopic.php?t=885

Fellowship of the Free Tale of Years: viewtopic.php?f=7&t=8318

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests