![Smile :)](images/smilies/icon_e_smile.gif)
NPC's and New Errata and Clarification
Re: NPC's and New Errata and Clarification
... Lets try and keep it civil, gents, please. Jon, Andrew and Dom are all away at Gencon at the moment so lets behave while our "dad's" are out selling pretend elf games to our compatriots. ![Smile :)](images/smilies/icon_e_smile.gif)
![Smile :)](images/smilies/icon_e_smile.gif)
TOR resources thread: viewtopic.php?f=7&t=62
TOR miniatures thread: viewtopic.php?t=885
Fellowship of the Free Tale of Years: viewtopic.php?f=7&t=8318
TOR miniatures thread: viewtopic.php?t=885
Fellowship of the Free Tale of Years: viewtopic.php?f=7&t=8318
Re: NPC's and New Errata and Clarification
And I'm being a pedant ... if you're fighting them, an NPC is axiomatically an adversary, and should be getting the bonus on great and exceptional success. Otherwise, the threat level is much too low.Hermes Serpent wrote:Aramis, You've no doubt noticed I capitalise those terms that I'm using in context of their meaning within the rules. There's a specific reason for that. It identifies when I'm using that term for that specific meaning. I don't honestly care what you do in your game, I'm trying to provide some help to someone who asked for it not someone who want's to play the pedant card.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Corvo, Moria Firefly and 5 guests