Adversaries and Zero Endurance

Adventure in the world of J.R.R. Tolkien’s The Lord of the Rings. Learn more at our website: http://www.cubicle7.co.uk/our-games/the-one-ring/
User avatar
Heilemann
Posts: 318
Joined: Sun Feb 09, 2014 12:04 am
Location: New York
Contact:

Adversaries and Zero Endurance

Post by Heilemann » Tue Aug 19, 2014 3:32 am

Do adversaries die when reduced to zero endurance? If not, what do you do with them? How long are they out for? If the characters don't want those orcs to return, do they slit their throats? Where's the line for gaining shadow for that?

User avatar
Morgoth
Posts: 477
Joined: Tue May 13, 2014 7:10 pm
Location: Angband (Quincy IL)

Re: Adversaries and Zero Endurance

Post by Morgoth » Tue Aug 19, 2014 3:36 am

LM 64-65:
a creature is knocked out of combat at the end of a round if it is reduced to zero Endurance, or is killed outright when it is wounded once.
I smashed down the light and dared Valinor
I smashed down the light, revenge will be mine

Glorelendil
Posts: 5140
Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 5:20 pm

Re: Adversaries and Zero Endurance

Post by Glorelendil » Tue Aug 19, 2014 4:14 am

I don't think that's what he was asking.

I think he's asking the following: so let's say you reduce a bunch of orcs to zero endurance, with no wounds in the whole fight. Then what? Do you slit their throats (shadow!) or do you walk away? If the latter, how long before the orcs all wake up complaining about hangovers?
The Munchkin Formerly Known as Elfcrusher
Journey Computer | Combat Simulator | Bestiary | Weapon Calculator

Arkat
Posts: 61
Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2014 11:47 am

Re: Adversaries and Zero Endurance

Post by Arkat » Tue Aug 19, 2014 7:23 am

In a fight with orcs I wouldn't bother making my players have to face the dilemma. Orcs reduced to zero endurance are counted as dead as long as something else isn't nescesary. But if they need to interrogate some of the orcs then enough orcs would be just dying for this to happen.

In a fight with a more ambigious foe, I might make a point of it if it makes sense. Fighting against the people of Tyrant hill early in Darkening or bandits out of The Toft would probably make me rule that most of them would be just injured.

User avatar
Faire
Posts: 36
Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2014 6:56 am

Re: Adversaries and Zero Endurance

Post by Faire » Tue Aug 19, 2014 8:06 am

I wouldn't assign any SP for that - it is something that logically must happen after every battle and IMHO akin to putting down injured pet / horse, as brutal as it might seem. I doubt that Rohirrim checked the orcish casaulties to apply first aid after they defeated them - and before they burned them.

User avatar
Morgoth
Posts: 477
Joined: Tue May 13, 2014 7:10 pm
Location: Angband (Quincy IL)

Re: Adversaries and Zero Endurance

Post by Morgoth » Tue Aug 19, 2014 11:43 am

In my campaigns, we usually just assume that the downed orcs will bleed out in a short time unless treated. But I wouldn't give Shadow points for putting downed orcs out of their misery.
I smashed down the light and dared Valinor
I smashed down the light, revenge will be mine

User avatar
Rich H
Posts: 4132
Joined: Wed May 08, 2013 8:19 pm
Location: Sheffield, UK

Re: Adversaries and Zero Endurance

Post by Rich H » Tue Aug 19, 2014 12:44 pm

Heilemann wrote:Do adversaries die when reduced to zero endurance?
Unless they have an ability that says otherwise then this is something I adopt. In other words, against the average opponent, Wounding is a short cut to reducing endurance to zero but the outcomes are the same. And your follow up questions are why I adopted this...
Heilemann wrote:If not, what do you do with them? How long are they out for? If the characters don't want those orcs to return, do they slit their throats? Where's the line for gaining shadow for that?
... It's just something I didn't want to get into in my campaign as it's arguable (I've seen many references to it on this very forum) that even things like Orcs are part of the Law of Middle Earth and therefore slaying them in such a way could result in Shadow Points whether the characters think they are committing an evil/malicious act or not.
TOR resources thread: viewtopic.php?f=7&t=62
TOR miniatures thread: viewtopic.php?t=885

Fellowship of the Free Tale of Years: viewtopic.php?f=7&t=8318

User avatar
shipwreck
Posts: 321
Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2014 12:49 pm
Location: Atlanta
Contact:

Re: Adversaries and Zero Endurance

Post by shipwreck » Tue Aug 19, 2014 2:18 pm

I like the idea of niggling the rule to your advantage, ie. if they're Men and they're not wounded and perhaps partial to the plot the heroes could consider helping them, questioning them, or just leaving them alive.

Can't say if the ambiguity was intended but the usage is there.
Elfcrusher wrote:But maybe the most important difference is that in D&D the goal is to build wtfpwn demi-god characters. In TOR the goal is to stay alive long enough to tell a good story.

User avatar
Rocmistro
Posts: 777
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 12:24 am
Location: Albany, NY

Re: Adversaries and Zero Endurance

Post by Rocmistro » Tue Aug 19, 2014 2:21 pm

I would not have a problem with heroes euthanizing orcs, as long as their reasoning seemed sound.

If they were doing it for sport, torture, punishment, etc, then that would be worth shadow points.

If they just do it because it's a thing that must be done, and demonstrate that they take no joy in it, I would not award Shadow points. It's not like an Orc that has been mortally wounded and/or defeated in combat has much of a life waiting for him. What's he going to get, a medical discharge and be released back to a welcoming wife and kids? He's likely to be tortured to death for his failure as a signal to other orcs, or put out of his misery in much the same way as the players would do it (only he could possibly be conscious and aware of such an act.)
Rignuth: Barding Wordweaver Wanderer in Southron Loremaster's game.
Amroth Ol'Hir: High Elf Vengeful Kin Slayer in Zedturtle's game.
Jakk O'Malli: Dwarven Orator Treasure-Hunter in Hermes Serpent's game.

User avatar
Rich H
Posts: 4132
Joined: Wed May 08, 2013 8:19 pm
Location: Sheffield, UK

Re: Adversaries and Zero Endurance

Post by Rich H » Tue Aug 19, 2014 2:46 pm

shipwreck wrote:I like the idea of niggling the rule to your advantage, ie. if they're Men and they're not wounded and perhaps partial to the plot the heroes could consider helping them, questioning them, or just leaving them alive.

Can't say if the ambiguity was intended but the usage is there.
I allow players to declare subdual damage before an attack if they wish to capture someone for questioning.
TOR resources thread: viewtopic.php?f=7&t=62
TOR miniatures thread: viewtopic.php?t=885

Fellowship of the Free Tale of Years: viewtopic.php?f=7&t=8318

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Wbweather and 3 guests