The question is the same: in an Age three thousand years long, how many years are "at the end of the Third Age"?bluejay wrote:The appendices use the words "at the end of the Third Age"
3?
30?
300?
The question is the same: in an Age three thousand years long, how many years are "at the end of the Third Age"?bluejay wrote:The appendices use the words "at the end of the Third Age"
There is some room for interpretation as to whether Saruman did breed his own stock of such orc-kin and what the Uruk-hai actually were - the same name could be used for two different types/strains of Orc, for example. Consider the following:Erland Hakon wrote:Perhaps in Peter Jackson's Middle Earth but not in Tolkien's Middle EarthEnevhar Aldarion wrote:Or Saruman. He did create the Uruk-hai, after all.Stormcrow wrote:That's a good point: a lot of the monstrous beings in Middle-earth are the results of biological experiments by Morgoth or Sauron. Their heritage could be anything.
Were Sauron's Uruk-hai powerful Black Orcs whereas Saruman's were cross-bred men and Orcs? Both using the same name? I think it's open to debate and further investigation but I personally go with this for my game; Sauron creating the first stock of such creatures and then Saruman following with his own and them being quite different in origin. I think the ambiguity creates more realism and allows for more than one interpretation - I quite like that for my campaign/interpratation of canon there is more than one truth to this and other elements of Middle-earth."We are the fighting Uruk-hai! We slew the great warrior. We took the prisoners. We are the servants of Saruman the Wise, The White Hand: The Hand that gives us man's-flesh to eat. We came out of Isengard, and led you here, and we shall lead you back by the way we choose."
- The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers, Chapter 3, "The Uruk-hai".
Okay, here's the (quick) evidence I've collected on the subject in order to suggest a time for their appearance. First, a quote for the Uruk-hai:Erland Hakon wrote:The question is the same: in an Age three thousand years long, how many years are "at the end of the Third Age"?bluejay wrote:The appendices use the words "at the end of the Third Age"
3?
30?
300?
The above quote gives you more than 500 years between Sauron deploying a species of 'great' Orc and the War of the Ring. Did the Olog-hai follow after? I would suspect Sauron would have experimented and established the Orc strain first and then moved on to Trolls but did he work on one after the other? How quickly did one follow the other? When were they first used and how far did they range?"In the last years of Denethor I the race of Uruks, black Orcs of great strength, first appeared out of Mordor, and in 2475 they swept across Ithilien and took Osgiliath."
- The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King, Appendices
So, did they appear before the Necromancer was driven from Dol Guldur in Southern Mirkwood by the White Council or later after Sauron declared himself in Mordor? I would suspect the latter so would suggest it would be in the last 50 years, or so, of the Third Age.But at the end of the Third Age a troll-race not before seen appeared in southern Mirkwood and in the mountain borders of Mordor. Olog-hai they were called in the Black Speech. That Sauron bred them none doubted, though from what stock was not known. Some held that they were not Trolls but giant Orcs; but the Olog-hai were in fashion of body and mind quite unlike even the largest of Orc-kind, whom they far surpassed in size and power. Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race, strong, agile, fierce and cunning, but harder than stone. Unlike the older race of the Twilight they could endure the Sun, so long as the will of Sauron held sway over them. They spoke little, and the only tongue that they knew was the Black Speech of Barad-dûr.
- The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King, Appendices
Not at all, feel free to share. I've only quoted the bits from the appendices to provide information. If it works for your campaign to have Ologs (I constantly have to resist the urge to type 'Olgas' instead) appear earlier then go right ahead - it's your game and cool always trumps canon, at least it does for me. Although "cool + canon" is even better.Erland Hakon wrote:If all this Olog-Hai/Ogre discussion is about something that anything we could say, may be or not (since there is nothing anywhere to confirm definitively one way or other)... better not to tell the explanation in my campaign for the existence of giants.
Well it would arguably be worse in Italian because ogre is 'orco' and indeed both words (ogre and Orc) are ultimately derived from the same source (the Latin word Orcus).Erland Hakon wrote:If all this Olog-Hai/Ogre discussion is about something that anything we could say, may be or not (since there is nothing anywhere to confirm definitively one way or other)... better not to tell the explanation in my campaign for the existence of giants.
[ I put the ring on my finger and I keep lurking again ]
I read the books long before the movies ever existed and my interpretation of Tolkien's writing is that, yes, Saruman did create his own troops. The Man-Orc, capable of going out in full daylight without any of the pesky drawbacks that regular orcs/goblins had when out in the sun.Erland Hakon wrote:Perhaps in Peter Jackson's Middle Earth but not in Tolkien's Middle EarthEnevhar Aldarion wrote:Or Saruman. He did create the Uruk-hai, after all.Stormcrow wrote:That's a good point: a lot of the monstrous beings in Middle-earth are the results of biological experiments by Morgoth or Sauron. Their heritage could be anything.
Well, one last message for now.Rich H wrote:Not at all, feel free to share.
Users browsing this forum: Falenthal and 5 guests