Why do we want Rangers alone to not benefit from the Hope offered by the Fellowship; arguably their closest friends and companions?
Can't agree on the Twice-baked Honey Cakes benefit; that extra Hope far outweighs the reduction in travel TN in my experience; a far greater range of application than lowering TNs by one level.
Lembas vs. Dunedain
Re: Lembas vs. Dunedain
TOR resources thread: viewtopic.php?f=7&t=62
TOR miniatures thread: viewtopic.php?t=885
Fellowship of the Free Tale of Years: viewtopic.php?f=7&t=8318
TOR miniatures thread: viewtopic.php?t=885
Fellowship of the Free Tale of Years: viewtopic.php?f=7&t=8318
-
- Posts: 1116
- Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2013 7:52 pm
- Location: Valinor
Re: Lembas vs. Dunedain
Heh. I've always been a bit of a Hope Conservationist, myself. Although I usually play Noldor and am more concerned with minimizing Shadow.
-
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2014 1:35 am
Re: Lembas vs. Dunedain
I'd go with allowing Rangers to benefit from it, since I can't see a logical reason why they wouldn't. It just doesn't make sense to me that the food would be super-healthy for everyone except Rangers.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Winterwolf and 4 guests