Saul Zaentz dies at 92

Adventure in the world of J.R.R. Tolkien’s The Lord of the Rings. Learn more at our website: http://www.cubicle7.co.uk/our-games/the-one-ring/
User avatar
Rich H
Posts: 4157
Joined: Wed May 08, 2013 8:19 pm
Location: Sheffield, UK

Re: Saul Zaentz dies at 92

Post by Rich H » Sat Jan 04, 2014 9:23 pm

The films weren't the issue, it was other products like casino games that the court case was aimed at so whether the action was won by them or not wouldn't lead to the film(s) getting withdrawn from release. At least that's my understanding.
TOR resources thread: viewtopic.php?f=7&t=62
TOR miniatures thread: viewtopic.php?t=885

Fellowship of the Free Tale of Years: viewtopic.php?f=7&t=8318

Stormcrow
Posts: 1352
Joined: Sat May 18, 2013 2:56 pm
Location: Ronkonkoma, NY
Contact:

Re: Saul Zaentz dies at 92

Post by Stormcrow » Sat Jan 04, 2014 9:51 pm

Beran wrote:I did like the little snort the Balrog gave after the "You shall not pass" line in the movie.
I hated everything about the film balrog, especially its movie-dinosaur roaring.

Beran
Posts: 1059
Joined: Wed May 08, 2013 5:03 pm

Re: Saul Zaentz dies at 92

Post by Beran » Sat Jan 04, 2014 9:58 pm

Stormcrow wrote:
Beran wrote:I did like the little snort the Balrog gave after the "You shall not pass" line in the movie.
I hated everything about the film balrog, especially its movie-dinosaur roaring.
Wow! Can we at least agree the sky is blue, Stormcrow?;) You mean you didn't even like the over all look of the Balrog? How should it have been done?

Beran
Posts: 1059
Joined: Wed May 08, 2013 5:03 pm

Re: Saul Zaentz dies at 92

Post by Beran » Sat Jan 04, 2014 9:59 pm

Rich H wrote:The films weren't the issue, it was other products like casino games that the court case was aimed at so whether the action was won by them or not wouldn't lead to the film(s) getting withdrawn from release. At least that's my understanding.

From the info presented above I would agree.

Stormcrow
Posts: 1352
Joined: Sat May 18, 2013 2:56 pm
Location: Ronkonkoma, NY
Contact:

Re: Saul Zaentz dies at 92

Post by Stormcrow » Sat Jan 04, 2014 10:08 pm

It should have been a large, human-like figure of shadow. When it crosses a pit of fire the flames surround it. After Gandalf says the dark fire will not avail it, its flames should have disappeared and it should have grown enormous and its shadow should have covered the chamber. It would not have made any sound at all. And it would not have wings.

And Gandalf would say, "You cannot pass." And he wouldn't shout it. And he doesn't trick the balrog into stepping forward; he just breaks the bridge while it's standing on it.

And Moria's east-gate didn't open by a riddle! You just had to tell it you were a friend, and the instructions were written on it.

*grumble, grumble*

Beran
Posts: 1059
Joined: Wed May 08, 2013 5:03 pm

Re: Saul Zaentz dies at 92

Post by Beran » Sat Jan 04, 2014 10:43 pm

Stormcrow wrote:It should have been a large, human-like figure of shadow. When it crosses a pit of fire the flames surround it. After Gandalf says the dark fire will not avail it, its flames should have disappeared and it should have grown enormous and its shadow should have covered the chamber. It would not have made any sound at all. And it would not have wings.

Ok, we fall again into the differences of the printed page and the movie. What you describe is a really cool and I can see it in my minds eye. Though, I did picture the Balrog as little more demonic then you did. And I like the description of his shadow (when did we start talking bout Lexx?) covering the chamber. However, the silence would not have worked on film; audiences expect alot of noise from the big bad...unless you are talking Micheal Myers or Jason.

User avatar
Curulon
Posts: 272
Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2013 9:01 pm

Re: Saul Zaentz dies at 92

Post by Curulon » Sat Jan 04, 2014 11:07 pm

Beran wrote:
Stormcrow wrote:It should have been a large, human-like figure of shadow. When it crosses a pit of fire the flames surround it. After Gandalf says the dark fire will not avail it, its flames should have disappeared and it should have grown enormous and its shadow should have covered the chamber. It would not have made any sound at all. And it would not have wings.

Ok, we fall again into the differences of the printed page and the movie. What you describe is a really cool and I can see it in my minds eye. Though, I did picture the Balrog as little more demonic then you did. And I like the description of his shadow (when did we start talking bout Lexx?) covering the chamber. However, the silence would not have worked on film; audiences expect alot of noise from the big bad...unless you are talking Micheal Myers or Jason.
Agreed. Especially with the set-up with the epic, awesome music and chanting and the whole Khazad-dum sequence, the silence would have been off-putting.

Angelalex242
Posts: 1116
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2013 7:52 pm
Location: Valinor

Re: Saul Zaentz dies at 92

Post by Angelalex242 » Sun Jan 05, 2014 2:50 am

Hmmm.

Even so...who won the court case? Does anybody know?

User avatar
Trotter
Posts: 92
Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 1:37 am
Location: Omaha, Nebraska, USA
Contact:

Re: Saul Zaentz dies at 92

Post by Trotter » Sun Jan 05, 2014 4:31 am

Too late, Angelalex. We've moved on to balrogs. :D

Angelalex242
Posts: 1116
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2013 7:52 pm
Location: Valinor

Re: Saul Zaentz dies at 92

Post by Angelalex242 » Sun Jan 05, 2014 7:37 am

Well, that's a Peter Jackson thing.

Who apparently subscribes to the idea of Balrogs=Balor.

Balor, of course, being the most powerful demon type from 3.5 AD&D. Jackson's Balrog greatly resembles the 3.5 creature. Whether it resembles what Tolkien actually had in mind is anyone's guess.

Considering the Balrog is of the same species as Gandalf and Sauron, however, you think it'd look more like the latter set on fire instead of a Balor. Unlike Sauron back in the day, Balrogs can't take pleasing shapes, so it'd be purely a thing of terror.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 7 guests