Oh, you're such a big creep and biased too; but I love you, man!
+1 to this; I really am enjoying reading it so far.
Oh, you're such a big creep and biased too; but I love you, man!
+1 to this; I really am enjoying reading it so far.
I'd bet a table and a round of beers at The Pony would make it all better.Kirppu wrote: ↑And I agree with you about the 'conversation around the table' scenario totally
God if that actually could be arranged I might even buy a round! We might even get to throw apples over Ferny's hedge?
Biased, yes. But that doesn't mean I'm wrong! Love you back!
I hear there is a pencil factory in Pennsylvania.Stormcrow wrote: ↑Wed Jun 28, 2017 7:59 pmOHNOMUSTRATIONALIZE!!!
They certainly know where the name Bree comes from; they correctly say it means hill. And they clearly know what a combe is. So maayyyyyybeee they knew that Archet has nothing to do with archers but wanted to have a joke, but that sounds like a post-gotcha rationalization. Jon fell into the trap, and he's one of the writers. AND THERE ARE STILL NO STADDLES IN STADDLE!
As for Bree-landers making games of naming things: those names have apparently been around longer than the Shire. I think Tolkien gave them Celtic-derived names to make them parallel Celtic-derived place names in England, which survived the Anglo-Saxon and Norman invasions. The Shire's place-names are all newer, Anglo-Saxon and more modern English words stuck together, while Bree-land has some older words. I believe the relative ages of Bree and the Shire were brought up in the very first draft portion of The Lord of the Rings that brought the hobbits to the Bree, so the question of ancient versus modern was in Tolkien's head when he named these places.
You should consider 'Ruins of The North'.SirGalrim wrote: ↑Fri Jun 30, 2017 12:26 pmI love this book! Just like I thought I would.
I especially like the descriptions of the smaller towns around Bree. I couldn't not stop smiling and chuckling as I read it. It left me with that same good warm feeling as when reading the first chapters of the Hobbit and Lord of the Rings. The adventures intrigue me, but I have not got to read them in detail yet.
I could wish the (lone-)lands around Bree would be embroidered a little more though. Though I get that according to Tolkien lore it is really Lone-lands. But maybe describe a little more of some potential threats, ruins to explore etc.
It's funny that "every" quiet night at the Prancing Pony there is about 2,5% chance of meeting Bilbo Baggins. But I guess it has to be that "high" chance to actually happen sometimes in games. Most adventures don't spend every night of the adventure in the inn looking for people to meet.
I've done it the other way round: first read the adventures, now reading the rest of the book .
The nice thing about empty lands known to have ruins is that you can put ruins anywhere and have anything inside them. Just make something up.
That occurred to me too. (I think the chance is actually more like 1.4%.) After the first encounter with "Inigo Grubb-Took," I would consider just counting a 6 on the Success Die as the number of common Shire-hobbits visiting the inn, unless I wanted to entertain the possibility that Bilbo was, for some reason, visiting Bree every couple of years, which doesn't seem likely. And remember that you may have to come up with the backstory: who is the friend, and why has Bilbo traveled for weeks, all the way to Bree, to meet him?It's funny that "every" quiet night at the Prancing Pony there is about 2,5% chance of meeting Bilbo Baggins.
Both Ruins of the North and especially Rivendell include some info about the Lone-lands near Bree-land. The maps of Eriador from Journeys & Maps are also informative. The Lone-lands around Bree consist mostly of trackless wilderness very much like most of Eregion, but dotted with ruins, with rougher country to the south-west near the mines of the Dwarves in the southern Blue Mountains.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests