Ok.. so now it opens to a new question:
What about monsters? as long as they are more than the heroes, can they move from close combat to rearward at wish? (as long as one melee foe stays in melee for each player).
Passing to Rearward stance in the middle of a fight
Re: Passing to Rearward stance in the middle of a fight
If they choose engagements, then yes.
Re: Passing to Rearward stance in the middle of a fight
For example, see the Extended Example of Combat, p.182:
Engagement
Since there are more enemies than heroes, the Loremaster
proceeds to engage the company as he sees fit:
Beran, the Bride and Lifstan are first paired with one Attercop each [...]
...and the other is left unengaged (the Loremaster intends to send it to attack
Trotter using the creature’s Great Leap ability...).
Re: Passing to Rearward stance in the middle of a fight
That's nice to know; my literal interpretation of the RAW was correct, as per Andrew's statement, but I suspected the real way of it working wasn't and was more in keeping with the style of the TOR rules as a whole.Indur Dawndeath wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 11:18 pmI was sure that I had my interpretation backed by C7, just had to look a little while. Here it goes:
He never clearified further, but it stands that you are not locked in engagements if you want to withdraw to rearward and there is enough companions in close combat.
Cheers

I'll still be 'locking' engagements though as it works best for my group.
TOR resources thread: viewtopic.php?f=7&t=62
TOR miniatures thread: viewtopic.php?t=885
Fellowship of the Free Tale of Years: viewtopic.php?f=7&t=8318
TOR miniatures thread: viewtopic.php?t=885
Fellowship of the Free Tale of Years: viewtopic.php?f=7&t=8318
Re: Passing to Rearward stance in the middle of a fight
Look at it from a non-rules point of view. You and your comrades in close combat with a bunch of enemies, but you outnumber them. You're still engaged with an enemy, but you want to back out of close combat. To back off, you need your comrades to keep the enemy from following you. Since you've got allies who can do this, you back off and they close ranks in front of you. Being "engaged" is not a physical bond.
From the rules point of view, you need at least two allies in close combat to close ranks in front of you so you can move to Rearward stance. Whether or not you were previously engaged in close combat with an enemy is irrelevant; the enemy cannot physically follow you through your allies.
From the rules point of view, you need at least two allies in close combat to close ranks in front of you so you can move to Rearward stance. Whether or not you were previously engaged in close combat with an enemy is irrelevant; the enemy cannot physically follow you through your allies.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests